Showing posts with label political analysis @ Ireland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label political analysis @ Ireland. Show all posts
Tommy McKearney ✒ It’s becoming increasingly difficult to assess the behaviour of the Dublin government. 


Is it slavishly following a free-market agenda, indifferent to workers? Is it responding to pressure from abroad? Is it simply incompetent? Or is it the fact that there are elements of all three causes in the wretched performance that the unfortunate citizens of the 26 Counties are subjected to by this coalition government?

Inadequate regulation of meat factories and building sites for transnational corporations, the transit of US troops through Shannon Airport and the mismanagement of a pandemic are just a few examples of this sorry state of affairs. Above all, though, there is the unavoidable conclusion that, faced with fundamental change, the Republic’s ruling order simply doesn’t know what to do, apart from holding on to office at all costs.

The coalition’s handling of the covid pandemic exemplifies a government in disarray. This, remember, is the government in which the Department of Health assigned civil servants to check whether the minister’s Twitter account was up to date. Incredibly, while searching for Stephen Donnelly’s Twitter handle, the provision of mandatory hotel quarantine places had reached capacity. This is a government that claims it has worked to balance the needs of health and safety with the wellbeing of the economy but has mismanaged the former and allowed the middle classes to benefit disproportionately.

Several issues or events have emerged over the recent past to unsettle and disorient the old order. There is the covid pandemic, with all its ramifications for the economy and society; there is the impact of Brexit on the cosy relationship with London; add to that the North and the difficult matter of partition stubbornly refusing to go away. Overhanging all this, though, is the consternation caused by the rise of Sinn Féin.

It is this latter point that goes right to the bottom of ruling-class unease. It is not so much the party itself as what its re-emergence on the political scene indicates. After decades of stagnation north and south of the border there is now a sense that not only are the fundamentals changing but that a significant number of people are looking for something different and better.

Over recent decades there has been a welcome liberalisation throughout society. While of itself this does not necessarily challenge the ruling class, it is indicative of a weakening of once-powerful conformist influences. Mechanisms for governance have not changed as visibly or as quickly, yet there is real movement away from the past.

Nothing illustrates this better in the 26 Counties than the very obvious decline of the once all-powerful Fianna Fáil.

With opinion polls consistently showing Fianna Fáil scoring approximately half the Sinn Féin return, the writing is surely on the wall for Micheál Martin and his colleagues. Moreover, the de facto merger between the two conservative parties has shifted the axis away from the old non-choice between two right-wing entities.

This is not to say that Sinn Féin is offering a radical socialist alternative, rather that its electoral progress is indicative of possibilities for a new beginning.

It is north of the border, however, that we are witnessing unavoidable evidence of profound change that will undoubtedly have an impact throughout the entire country. Just as with Fianna Fáil in the Republic, the DUP has lost its touch and is desperately trying to retain a purchase on its core support.

Contrary to some opinion, Arlene Foster and her colleagues are not just politically inept on the wider UK stage: they are also struggling with a losing hand. Just consider the cause of their anxiety. Several of the most influential publications in Britain are now talking about the potential breakup of the United Kingdom.¹ Some of this may be idle speculation, but it is certainly disturbing for Northern unionists, especially when considered in tandem with Boris Johnson’s volte-face on the Northern Ireland protocol.

Still more ominous were the results of an opinion poll by Lucid Talk for the BBC NI’s programme “Spotlight,”² which recorded, albeit not necessarily emphasising, two pertinent facts.³ A majority of those in the age group 18–44 would vote to end partition immediately, while a majority of all respondents said they believed that twenty-five years years from now the Six Counties would no longer be in the United Kingdom.

Clearly, opinion polls are subject to margins of error and may be inaccurate. Nevertheless, these findings are in keeping with such widely verifiable facts as changing demographics and recent electoral results.

While it is not incontestable that the six-county political entity is entering its final phase, no-one could reasonably dispute that fundamental constitutional change is now more likely than not over the coming two or three decades. The DUP, being the party that it is, responds not with constructive proposals or a statesmanlike approach but instead provokes unrest in deprived unionist working-class communities. This time-honoured practice of playing the Orange card may temporarily extend the party’s electoral life, but only at the cost of the overall well-being of the citizenry.

All of which raises the question, What is the Dublin government doing to address such an urgent issue? Not surprisingly in the light of what we mentioned above, the ruling coalition is not only refusing to do anything constructive but is actively promoting a tendentious narrative in order to stifle consideration. The leader of Fianna Fáil, Micheál Martin, is attempting to avoid dealing with the situation by talking up the risk of instability and violence if an end to partition is discussed or planned for in any meaningful way. Rather than acknowledge changing realities in the North and launch a programme to address this fact, he is adopting a policy of “pro-actively standing idly by,” a strategy that failed woefully to prevent bloodshed in the North when adopted fifty years ago by his mentor, Jack Lynch.

Without state power there is only so much those on the ground can do to circumvent this state of stasis. Rather than surrender to inertia, though, we can constantly emphasise the reality of the situation when and where we can. There is, moreover, the positive option of campaigning for the building of important all-Ireland institutions of vital necessity to the working class, north and south. There is already a nascent campaign for an all-Ireland national health service. That initiative deserves all our support and energy. What about also launching a drive to address the housing crisis by creating an all-Ireland Housing Executive, modelled on the best days of the Northern Ireland Housing Executive?

The advantage of such a campaign must be obvious to all who care to see. If successful it would address two major issues identified by Northern critics of reunification. It would also allow for a meaningful Northern input into the new republic. Moreover, it would make the ending of partition more attractive to the South’s working people. Finally, doing so would be a significant step towards undermining two major areas of privatisation led by vulture funds in the Republic.

If we could achieve that much I’d almost be tempted to support a campaign for Irish reunification myself!

References
George Parker, “Johnson struggles to find a way to keep the UK together,” Financial Times, 4 April 2021.

Tommy McKearney is a left wing and trade union activist. 
Follow on Twitter @Tommymckearney 

Constitutional Change On The Way?

Tommy McKearney argues in Socialist Voice that the political class throughout the country are not fit for purpose.


Not that it should come as a surprise, but the political establishment, north and south, is offering us still further evidence of its mendacious venality. A few recent examples will illustrate the point.

Let’s begin with shady behaviour being practised by the folk in Leinster House. Several members of the Fianna Fáil front bench were caught breaking voting regulations in the Dáil. Then we heard that other parties were also at it. Better still, Varadkar and Martin have also admitted to bending the button rule.

However, with such widespread abuse of practice it will undoubtedly go the way of the Garda breathalyser scandal. It will prove impossible, or should we say inconvenient, to penalise anyone for their misbehaviour.

Of course anything the guys and gals in Dáil Éireann can do the DUP can do better. There was last month’s bizarre charade over the extension of Britain’s abortion and same-sex marriage legislation to Northern Ireland. In spite of so-called DUP sensitivities about preserving legislative uniformity within the United Kingdom, Foster’s party was quite determined to pursue the anomaly of attempting to maintain socially conservative laws unique to Northern Ireland.

However bizarre that piece of theatrical grandstanding was, it pales in comparison with revelations about the RHI, otherwise known as cash-for-ash, scandal. For a tale of absolute chicanery it would be hard to beat Burned, the new book on the subject by a News Letter journalist, Sam McBride.¹ The story is astonishing, raising issues that range from questionable dealings at the international corporate level to such trivial grubby incidents as a Stormont minister haggling over the size of a free turkey. “Stretching credulity” does not even begin to cover it.

McBride’s book is based on testimony given to the Coghlin Inquiry; and while the contents are startling, the material is available in the public realm. Among the revelations are civil servants unduly influencing an initial feasibility study, the department responsible taking three years to identify a glaringly excessive overpayment flaw, and a transnational poultry producer becoming a major beneficiary, as were relatives of senior DUP advisers. To top it all, the minister responsible for introducing and running the scheme hadn’t read her brief. That minister was the current leader of the DUP, Arlene Foster.

In spite of this omni-shambles, Foster has refused to resign or even accept responsibility. Her party can’t, or won’t, sack her, and as a consequence devolved government is suspended, and in the absence of movement Sinn Féin is understandably reluctant to revive the Stormont Executive.

Nevertheless, to stay in office the British Conservative Party deemed it appropriate to enter into a “confidence and supply” agreement with the same DUP, a political party that can at best be described as grossly incompetent.

In the light of all this, the question arises whether the bulk of our elected representatives are charlatans; or does the problem go much deeper? McBride mentions that, notwithstanding the spectacular irregularities revealed in his book, many members of the DUP were genuinely appalled at what had happened, and assisted him with his research.

Some might well ask why they didn’t speak out earlier, or indeed speak out at all, but that may be to miss the point. As with the case in the Republic, it’s more to do with the system than simply with the individuals.

The partition of Ireland created by British imperialism is a major source of system failure in the North. It continues to reinforce divisions between working-class communities and facilitates an unnatural alliance with right-wing British Tories. Moreover, the existence of a border has allowed a misguided campaign to be built on the basis of support for the European Union, ostensibly to prevent a strengthening of partition.

Although clearly not designed to do so, and against Boris Johnson’s repeated declarations, Britain’s withdrawal from the European Union is undermining the solidity of the United Kingdom. Moreover, this appears to be the received wisdom among political commentators in London: that Northern Ireland’s position can and will be traded for a deal with Brussels.² Taken along with demographic changes and the obvious failure of the Six-County political entity, the constitutional issue returns to centre stage.

It is not pandering to crude Hibernian nationalism to support the call for an end to partition and support the unification of Ireland. It is important, however, to spell out loud and clear that uniting Ireland under the control of the current Leinster House regime would be of limited value to working people. The voting shenanigans are but a symptom of the underlying malaise affecting the body politic in the Republic.

Common to both existing jurisdictions is a form of governance that facilitates free-market neo-liberalism, concentrates wealth and power in the hands of a few, and makes it difficult for the wider public to directly influence their daily lives. Allowing the people to vote once every four or five years, in an atmosphere influenced by state-controlled or private-enterprise media, curtails popular sovereignty.³ No surprise that there exists such a cavalier attitude towards voting rectitude and transparency among the elected representatives in Leinster House.

An accountable democracy in a different type of republic is needed, and certainly not an amalgamation of the two jurisdictions, nor an extension of the existing set-up in the South, but a republic that spreads democracy to the grass roots, where the people are sovereign, and where their well-being and prosperity is not in the hands of British imperialism or regulated and impaired by a neo-liberal European Union.

It is important, nevertheless, that socialist republicans recognise that this is something that must be advocated clearly and persistently. Campaigning for Irish unity without defining the nature of the new republic almost certainly guarantees the entrenchment of those now in power, along with the injustices endemic within capitalism. It is imperative that we promote our anti-imperialist, socialist message and strategy loudly, clearly, and often.

This is not an easy task in the present environment, caught as we are between reactionary unionism on one side and a contemporary version of Redmondism on the other. However, we should never underestimate the capacity of Irish working people to assert themselves and challenge the establishment. There is no reason whatsoever that this can’t happen again and that we definitively bring an end to the existing mendacious, venal political system.

1. Sam McBride, Burned: The Inside Story of the “Cash-for-Ash” Scandal and Northern Ireland’s Secretive New Elite (Dublin: Irish Academic Press, 2019).

2. See, for example, Arthur Beesley, “Will Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal pave way to united Ireland? Closer alignment with EU and the Republic risks breaking Northern Ireland’s UK ties,” Financial Times, 25 October 2019.

3. Note, for example, the mainstream media boycott of the recent state visit to Ireland by the president of Cuba, Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez.


Tommy McKearney is a left wing activist and author of 




Voting Shenanigans Are Only A Symptom

Liberalism has always been the Achilles’ heel of Unionism. In his latest Fearless Flying Column today, controversial political commentator Dr John Coulter analyses how the so-called ‘Latte Libs’ within the Protestant community have played right slap bang into the hands of Sinn Fein.

Latte Libs

The DUP must demand a hard political border with the Irish Republic as part of the Brexit negotiations to back Southern parties into a corner they cannot get out of. Controversial commentator, Dr John Coulter, uses his Fearless Flying Column to set out the economic case for a hard border – and the benefits for Unionism.

Bring Back O'Neill

Finnian O Domhnaill  surveys the political landscape and discusses possibilities. Finnian O Domhnaill is a political writer from Donegal, currently living in Derry. He is the creator of the political page  No Bones About It.

The Fianna Fail Shinners Vs The Fine Gael Unionists