Showing posts with label Trinity College Dublin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trinity College Dublin. Show all posts
Gearóid Ó Loingsigh ☭ writing in Socialist Democracy on the virtue signalling plaguing Trinity College's Berkeley Library. 

Berkeley Library, Trinity College Dublin

Trinity College Dublin has announced it is to “dename” the Berkeley Library at the university due to his links to slavery. Who, or what is to replace him as the titular of the library is not clear yet, though we can be certain about who is excluded from the list: those who actually fought against slavery.

It is a strange moment, as Trinity is not exactly a progressive institution. It was founded as part of an act of colonial conquest of Ireland and until 1793 effectively excluded Catholics from its hallowed halls. Yet now it seeks to apologise for having named a library after one Berkeley. Exactly who is this reprobate? He is none other than the philosopher George Berkeley, who was a graduate of Trinity and an influential thinker in the 18th Century, with some periods of revival in later years. He was also an Anglican Bishop. He, like many of his ilk in the period owned and trafficked in slaves, which is the reason proffered by Trinity College for removing his name from the library.

There are various questions that arise around this issue. One is whether he was ever a worthy character to have a library named after him. Only the most ignorant woke idiot could question his role in the development of philosophy, which is why Trinity decided to lend his name to its new library in 1978. His contribution to philosophy and learning is beyond doubt. So why should his name be removed from a library? He committed the cardinal sin of having been linked to the slave trade. His role and that of others in the slave trade should not be over looked. But this is just virtue signalling. Trinity is not serious about examining its past, nor are the Irish people either.

Berkeley is almost certainly not the only slave trader linked with Trinity, nor the only slave trader linked with Ireland. A very celebrated event in Irish history is the sending of 170 dollars from the Choctaw Nation to Ireland for famine relief and a monument has been built in honour of this genuine gesture of solidarity. Except of course, the Choctaw Nation were slaveholders and owned over 2000 black slaves and it has been said that the money raised for famine relief was the result of the sale of slaves. Suddenly, de-naming Berkeley is a bit more complicated. Shouldn’t we also do something about the Choctaw? i.e. knock down the wonderful monument erected in their honour as a sign of gratitude during the famine. Or would a more nuanced discussion be warranted?

Liberals and woke types writhe in agony at how to resolve these questions. Marxists do not. They sleep a bit easier. Partly because they lay no claim to the laws, traditions and institutions that have arisen from them. Whether Trinity was founded by slave traders or not, is irrelevant. Those who seek to claim these institutions not only as their own, but as institutions in their own image, reflecting some biblical creation of a god and his own image are a little more taxed.

So, to be clear. What is Trinity University? It an educational institution that was established as an act of the colonisation and conquest of Ireland. Its formal name is telling: The College of the Holy and Undivided Trinity of Queen Elizabeth near Dublin (it was outside Dublin at the time, located at All Hallows, hence the near). Up until 1793, Catholics were, in effect barred from graduating, the final restrictions on their full participation not lifted until 1873 and women were not accepted until 1904. Of course, neither Catholics nor women are worthy subjects for our woke warriors. There is nothing progressive about Trinity’s history, but that does not mean we should abandon it, in the name of virtue signalling. It has produced many a great contribution to society. Oscar Wilde was a graduate, Edmund Burke, whose statue adorns the entrance was a philosopher who argued against slavery. The institution was throughout its history a faithful reflection of Irish upper-class society, its mores and class relations. The Anglo-Irish dominated it for centuries.

Though to be clear Berkeley had his name added in 1978, it is very recent and was an example of intellectual name dropping. Although he was a graduate of Trinity and even lectured there at one point, he was a well-travelled man, spending most of his life away from the institution and when he died at Oxford, he was the retired Church of Ireland Bishop of Cloyne. Lots of places could claim him.

There are two other libraries at Trinity. The Ussher library, named after a sectarian bigot who opposed Catholics right to exercise their religion stating “to consent that they may freely exercise their religion, and profess their faith and doctrine, is a grievous sin.” The Lecky Library is named after an opponent of Home Rule, and one of his works is The Empire, its Value and its Growth. Let’s remember that the Empire was the organised plunder and rape of a huge part of the Planet. Trinity is unlikely to apologise for that, as many of them probably harbour a yearning for the days when Ireland was part of the UK and perhaps even lament the passing of the golden days of the Empire. But in fairness, Ussher was a man of his time and his views were quite common amongst Protestants throughout Europe and indeed Catholics generally held a similar view of Protestants, though in the case of Ireland, the Protestants held power at swordpoint.

So, he is not the only problematic person associated with Trinity. Its School of Genetics is named after Smurfits, the Irish paper and packaging magnate whose company has a very dubious record in Colombia and other parts. One day, we might frown upon the company and the family with a similar disdain. One day we might also remove the names of English lords, Lord Lieutenants, Viceroys and others from the main streets of Dublin city centre. But the time for doing that probably passed, when the counter revolution won the Civil War, defeating Irish republicans. When societies change, the nomenclature changes. It is in periods of upheaval that this happens to reflect the changing order, not the other way around. No one is going to argue in favour of keeping the name, but it is just virtue signalling. Who will replace him? Probably some banal figure that reflects the current political order. If it was named after Zelensky, it would only surprise me a little. 

But maybe Trinity could reflect on its imperial past and name it and the Ussher Library after two famous graduates and rebels: Wolfe Tone, the founder and leader of the United Irishmen, and the leader of the 1798 Rebellion and Robert Emmet, the executed Irish patriot. But don’t hold your breath, it will take other times and renewed political consciousness for that to ever happen. Virtue signallers won’t be doing that, ever. They are not part of the solution.

⏩ Gearóid Ó Loingsigh is a political and human rights activist in Latin America.

To Berkeley Or Not Berkeley

Anthony McIntyre
is disappointed at Richard Dawkins being snubbed by Trinity College’s Historical Society.

Internationally renowned evolutionary biologist and atheist Richard Dawkins has had an invitation to address Trinity College’s Historical Society next year withdrawn. The world’s oldest student debating society auditor, Brid O’Donnell, in a ludicrous statement reeking more of woke than wisdom, claimed that she was “unaware of Richard Dawkins’ opinions on Islam and sexual assault until this evening.”

How O’Donnell did not know Dawkins' opinions in advance illustrates the dangers of valuing ignorance. She stood to learn much from Dawkins had the decision to invite him not been reversed. Not content to suffer in silence her affliction of being dangerously unaware, she is intent on becoming a super spreader so that ultimately the virus of ignorance will strike everyone down.

Her first targets were the student members of the Hist, as it is known. In order that they might know as little as she, Richard Dawkins was disinvited in a bid to thwart the intellectual insight that he was likely to bring. Exposure to critical ideas was less important to O’Donnell than “the comfort of our membership." Nothing, of course, to do with her own condescending chauvinism which could only see students as snowflakes likely to melt when confronted with an incendiary idea: something like Young Earth Science and Flat Earth Science being intellectual equals.

The reasoning was spurious. Dawkins being an atheist is of course going to reject the tenets of Islam and all other religions. He is a firm opponent of creationism being taught in schools as science rather than the junk science it is, which has of course angered religious fundamentalists of all hues including some within Islam. Dawkins lamented that Muslim students frequently walked out of class during discussions on evolution. That they might have a preference for magic, much like their Christian evangelical counterparts, is no reason for public educators to remain silent out of respect for their religious opinion.

As for his views on sexual assault:

Well apparently it refers to two tweets he sent in 2014, in which he suggested that being drunk and unable to remember being assaulted might make it more difficult to secure a prosecution.

Hardly much controversial there. It seems horrendous that a victim of rape might see her attacker go free because she was too intoxicated to remember the event. But this is what rape victims face in a legal system with a very low conviction rate for the vile offence of sexual violence. Dawkins did not seek to minimise the awfulness of sexual assault or give any quarter to rapists, but aimed to raise awareness about the evidentiary barriers that excessive alcohol consumption might raise. Enhancing awareness is something Brid O’Donnell seems hostile to. Nevertheless, it is a message I would have no difficulty sharing with my daughter. Maybe that will get me banned from Trinity as well. No more guest lectures at your invite then Professor Eunan O'Halpin! Thus spoke Brid the Banner.

The irony is that in a hotel less than a mile from Trinity, the same daughter when she was ten met Richard Dawkins at the World Atheist Convention who, while curious that one so young would be present, told her that he was writing a book for children of her age. Now at Trinity it seems she stands to learn a lot less in a university at 19 than she did in a hotel at 10.

The Hist has form for sticking fingers in its ears. Two years ago it also disinvited Nigel Farage. The then auditor Paul Molloy rowed back from his original compelling reason for inviting Farage:

The Society plays host to numerous individuals of divergent views, many of which our members feel strongly and passionately about. This is the nature of free enquiry in a democratic society. It is by that enquiry the strength of ideas and the validity of beliefs are challenged and upheld.

Once Molloy folded under pressure and disinvited Nasty Nigel the die was cast. Free inquiry was no longer the moving spirit of the Hist. To comfort the students, ideas had to be made uncomfortable and unwelcome.

Irish society might have thought it had purged itself of the spectre of Conor Cruise O’Brien. Brid O’Donnell in treating Dawkins as Cruise O’Brien did Mary Holland - when she too discomfited people Cruise O'Brien would rather view as mushrooms - has, like some deranged necromancer, breathed life into the the old ogre. 

⏩Follow on Twitter @AnthonyMcIntyre.

Disinviting Dawkins