Peter Anderson ✒ As I sat down to watch the Saturday night live game between Spurs and Man U, I couldn't help but notice that the silly season has returned.
There was Roy Keane wearing a poppy lapel badge, then as the teams lined up Spurs' 2 Argentinians, Romero and Lo Celso, were wearing poppies on their shirts. I can't imagine that Keane or the 2 Argentinians are big fans of the British army, but for the sake of a quiet life they have decided to wear a poppy. Maybe they do respect the British army I am only surmising that they don't, given the British army's history in Ireland and the relatively recent war between the UK and Argentina.
In recent years poppy fascism tends to be on the rise with TV stations foisting poppies on all that appear on their shows. That's not how it should be. It should be a decision for each individual. The soldiers of the Second World War fought and died to preserve us from totalitarianism, which includes the right to dissent from the prevailing or government view. Yet now when people appear in public without a poppy they are slaughtered on social media, prompting many to wear one for a quiet life.
In recent years poppy fascism tends to be on the rise with TV stations foisting poppies on all that appear on their shows. That's not how it should be. It should be a decision for each individual. The soldiers of the Second World War fought and died to preserve us from totalitarianism, which includes the right to dissent from the prevailing or government view. Yet now when people appear in public without a poppy they are slaughtered on social media, prompting many to wear one for a quiet life.
To be clear, I am an ex-member of the British army and proud to be so. Sometimes I wear a poppy and sometimes I don't. It never used to matter, in the glorious days before Twitter! For me remembrance is a private matter not one to be foisted on footballers from other countries, cultures or beliefs.
FIFA tried to ban the poppy in 2017 as "a political symbol" but the UK government got the ban overturned after a furious appeal. FIFA should have dug in. Politics, or religion for that matter, and sport shouldn't mix. The essence of sport is to compete while respecting each other and the rules of the game. There is no need to honour one team or one competitor's political opinion or religious persuasion.
Take the GAA: there is a team in South Derry named after an ex-player who was in jail for taking part in a punishment shooting on behalf of a sectarian murder gang. He didn't get the club named after him for anything he did on the pitch or boardroom. Why is that even allowed? Is it designed to keep unionists away from the GAA? Well, it certainly worked on me. Could you imagine if Linfield renamed themselves "Top Gun McKeag FC"? Would you blame nationalists for wanting nothing to do with the Irish League? Yet the GAA allow their clubs to do just that, though it is clear that many members are uneasy or embarrassed by that decision.
If there is a political, cultural or religious undercurrent to a match then it certainly adds spice and the real fans know it, like when England faced Maradona's Argentina 4 years after the Falklands war, or when Rangers play Celtic, for example. It makes the games more enthralling, but they are still only games at the end of the day, and that is the all important thing. What we don't need is official sporting recognition of political, cultural or religious norms.
FIFA tried to ban the poppy in 2017 as "a political symbol" but the UK government got the ban overturned after a furious appeal. FIFA should have dug in. Politics, or religion for that matter, and sport shouldn't mix. The essence of sport is to compete while respecting each other and the rules of the game. There is no need to honour one team or one competitor's political opinion or religious persuasion.
Take the GAA: there is a team in South Derry named after an ex-player who was in jail for taking part in a punishment shooting on behalf of a sectarian murder gang. He didn't get the club named after him for anything he did on the pitch or boardroom. Why is that even allowed? Is it designed to keep unionists away from the GAA? Well, it certainly worked on me. Could you imagine if Linfield renamed themselves "Top Gun McKeag FC"? Would you blame nationalists for wanting nothing to do with the Irish League? Yet the GAA allow their clubs to do just that, though it is clear that many members are uneasy or embarrassed by that decision.
If there is a political, cultural or religious undercurrent to a match then it certainly adds spice and the real fans know it, like when England faced Maradona's Argentina 4 years after the Falklands war, or when Rangers play Celtic, for example. It makes the games more enthralling, but they are still only games at the end of the day, and that is the all important thing. What we don't need is official sporting recognition of political, cultural or religious norms.
If Spurs want to have a remembrance service, fine. Have it at another time when nobody is compelled to attend or shamed into taking part.