Showing posts with label Iran. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iran. Show all posts
Stanley CohenHow long ago was it that Colin Powell sat before the United Nations Security Council with his twisted trove of compelling evidence that Iraq was host to a veritable mountain of weapons of mass destruction just awaiting the right moment to unleash its Shia ravage upon the stainless West?


Of course, it was a lie, a conscious pretext to justify what was to follow where tens of millions throughout the Middle East paid for this US “hard intelligence” with their liberty, their lives, and their yearning for little more than the universal right for them and their families to pursue the freedom of life. Some twenty years later the weapons of mass lie continue to propagate daily with an unbroken fabricated flood of deadly Western puffery about an innocent pastoral Israel under siege not at all by virtue of its own long and well-established regional hands of occupation filth, but of course by the voracious anti-Semitic appetite of Iran, Palestine, and Hamas. It’s a lie.

Gaza City under Israeli airstrikes, screengrab
from Al Jazeera’s live feed.

When expedient, for years we have been apprenticed by largely Western Christian and Jewish tutors along with purchased “Islamic scholars” about the branded unresolvable divide between Sunni and Shia denominations which, they preach, all but guarantees periodic eruptions within the Islamic world. After all, was it not this internecine scriptural split that explains away the horrors inflicted in Yemen upon the impoverished Iranian-supported Shias by the Sunni states of Saudi Arabia and UAE largely with weapons that were made in the USA?

Although the Saudi/UAE inflicted casualties continue, when the world last cared reliable sources report that over 150,000 people were killed in Yemen, as well as more than 227,000 dead as a result of an ongoing famine and lack of healthcare facilities due to the war.

Not packaged, let alone understood, for the internal civil war it was, how much easier and politically convenient to simply blame Iranian support and “control” over Houthi Shias against a Sunni government as the trigger for what was clearly an Indigenous political rebellion. How often were we told that Houthis were fighting as Iranian proxies rather than as combatants in a native uprising largely directed at the lingering legacy of European colonialism? Sound familiar?

So, tell me, if the marriage of an uprising in the Middle East is ultimately fueled not by aboriginal aspiration but strict theological obedience, how is it that the Shias of Iran are dictating to the Sunnis of Hamas what to do and when? They ain’t.

There is nothing I can say at this point in history that will move the lockstep sentiments of personally invested or reality-disconnected Israeli cheerleaders to understand, let alone accept, that Hamas is an Indigenous national liberation movement, born not from abstract thought, religious fueled hate or the chase of personal fortune, but rather from the hardscrabble roads of Gaza itself. So, I will not try.

Are there Palestinians who disagree, even at times despair, of Hamas… of course. But after 75 plus years of ethnic cleansing, you will not find any wanting for wholehearted support for the resistance–be it from millions still occupied by a deadly colonial project, or those long ago exiled at gun-point from their age-old homeland by Europeans who tore across it with unrestrained bombast and endless thirst for blood. For without defiance, whether from movements or “lone wolf” … be it by armed struggle or passive resistance … one comprised of Muslims, Christians and non-believers alike–of women and men, students and scholars, only fools or desperate wizards believe that if left to its own unchecked device, a kinder gentler Israel would emerge to ensure justice and human rights for those whose dwindling land they thirst and liberty they detest.

Has Iran provided financial aid to Hamas, some of which was used for the purchase or production of weapons? Of course. Why not. It is not the only country that has chosen sides in this struggle against ethnic cleansing and for righteous justice. After all, the United States has funded Israel to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars these many years which has financed the use of phosphorous and cluster bombs against civilians in Gaza in violation of Protocol III to The Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons of 1983 and The Convention on Cluster Munitions of 2008. It has also armed snipers who have shot tens of thousands of peaceful protestors on the Gaza border in violation of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Not one to limit its backing of Israeli butchery to but the air and land of Palestine, the US has long subsidized an Israeli navy whose prime function is to attack and destroy Palestinian fishing and humanitarian aid vessels be they in the Port of Gaza or afloat in the Mediterranean Sea.

Never one to suppress its own geo-political thirst or economic appetite, The Convention on Cluster Munitions was ignored earlier this year when the US elected to arm Ukraine with thousands of cluster bombs. So too, it disregarded the transfer of American-made weapons it provided to Saudi Arabia and its coalition partners in Yemen later transferred to al Qaeda-linked fighters, and other so-called radical Salafi militias. Nothing new about this. Independent of its invasions and occupations of Kuwait, Iraq, and Afghanistan, in the last thirty-five years alone the United States has intervened or proxied up in numerous international hot spots through money or weapons including Syria, Somalia, Haiti, Yugoslavia, Bosnia, Ethiopia, Kenya, Liberia, Mauritius, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda. With an unbroken sordid record of meddling, there is abundant evidence that the US has engaged in nearly 400 military interventions of one sort or another between 1776 and 2023. But Iran is the problem.

Over the years, billions in humanitarian aid have come to Gaza from Qatar, Kuwait, Turkey and Algeria to name but a few of the supportive sister states. Donated largely for reconstruction of essential infrastructure, schools and hospitals targeted and laid to waste by Israeli bombs, ribbon cutting in Gaza one of the world’s most densely populated and impoverished territories has proven time and time again to be but a momentary tease–with each restoration quickly lost to the next Israeli onslaught and the next and the next.

Once upon a time, before the lure of US dollars and Israeli shekels purchased a new generation in the Gulf, Saudi Arabia armed Hamas with rockets and other weapons for the defense of Gaza. However, that solidarity was to change with the arrival of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman who the very year he had Jamal Khashoggi murdered, told Jewish leaders in New York City that Palestinians should “start accepting peace proposals or shut up.” Five years later at the urging of Biden and with the blessing of his personal hedge fund banker, Jared Kushner, in the run-up to the Hamas strike, bin Salman was expected to sign the Abraham Accords. With that signature, he would have joined UAE, Bahrain and Morocco in a treacherous pact with Israel which places their own economic and geo-political interests ahead of not just palpable Israeli violations of international law, but all standards of decency and humanity. Trading in his bisht and red & white keffiyeh for Armani pinstripes, how can anyone avoid the overpowering stench of a regional double standard?

And what of the “proof” that Iran provided the skill set and dictated the nature and timing of the most recent Hamas strikes against the occupation? Now streaming in from predictable Zionist echo chambers at AIPAC and ADL to the halls of a cheap ill-informed Congress to the amplified one-sided MSM breaking news cycle… there is none. To be sure, like it or not, as a seasoned national liberation movement with an armed wing that has successfully battled to a stand-still Israeli jets, tanks, and battleships for decades, Hamas needs not, nor does it accept direction from non-Palestinian actors on how or when to proceed in its struggle against the occupation. Any such claim oozes with pejorative ignorance and racist superiority. Bearing the reek of classic hasbara, these shouts are but another in a long line of played deceits that Israel is an enlightened democracy under perpetual siege in the midst of doctrinal fired anti-Semitism.

Of course, Israelis tutor the West that they and they alone love and care for their families and young while the dominant regional Arab and Palestinian populations are more than willing to sacrifice their sons and daughters to a nihilist agenda in the name of Islam. Very much a living lie, for decades this marketing lure has enticed the neo-colonial West to ignore Israel’s marriage of hate and violence providing the money, weapons and Security Council vetoes it needs to keep it just beyond the reach of universal law and international accountability. Zionists would have us believe that Palestinians, per capita among the most highly educated people and culture in the world, know not what they want and or how to get there, but rather are mere dutiful vassals of Iran as it seeks to impose its brand of Shia fundamentalism upon the rest of the region. Nonsense.

Hamas is a national liberation movement dating back some 40 years to a time and place where an earlier generation of explosive, deadly Kahanists sought to corrupt if not rid Palestine of any collective aspiration of self-determination, independence and justice. The notion that all these years later the movement, now among the most sophisticated and successful in the region, if not the world, needs guidance, training and edict from any other state or people to fight on is but seductive sophistry in search of a vulnerable and ill-informed audience to bite the poison political pill. At its core, the tired screed that the Islamic Resistance Movement’s self-determination is determined by others not born of Palestinian families and heritage is but a shoddy deflection from the horrors unleashed by Zionists these past 75 years upon an Indigenous community dating back not decades or centuries but millennium.

For days now deceitful politicians and traditional media across the globe have parroted the sculpted Zionist talisman that there is war between Hamas and Israel. Not true. It is a battle for survival between a “nation state” of occupiers and a people long beleaguered … but not defeated. To be sure, if Hamas were to disappear tomorrow, the global Palestinian struggle for self-determination, liberty and justice would and will continue till it be had. To hear the unbroken chant of “terrorists” by Israel and its funders beggars the undeniable history of nonstop Zionist terrorism beginning well before the Irgun, Haganah and Palmach hanged British soldiers, bombed the King David Hotel, sent mail bombs across Europe and assassinated Swedish Count Folke Bernadotte, the United Nations mediator for Palestine all in the name of a theft of a land they had not known, if at all, for thousands of years.

With its leadership prominently displayed and well deserved on “wanted” posters throughout Palestine and in Europe for heinous offenses against civilians and repeated violations of settled international law, these Europeans went on to inspire generations to come with a dark deadly vision of a homeland not theirs to reclaim or to reconstruct and where, to them, no crime was too disturbing … no rationale too obtuse.

No matter what the Zionists rewrite, Palestine is a land stolen from age-old Indigenous communities with hundreds of thousands driven at gunpoint from their homes, but not their history. For the fortunate, they were exiled to refugee camps in and out of their homeland; for the less so, mass assassination, rape and a final rest rotting in wells were left as a message for others across Palestine. In the years since, that nightmare has continued unabated with millions of Palestinians living under the often-deadly, always despotic yoke of Zionist expanse and excuse; with many more eking out existence as stateless refugees living long and far from their native land.

In the years since the onset of the unchanged Nakba, hundreds of thousands of Palestinians including children and the elderly have been shot, crippled and murdered always in the name of a perverse ideal built fundamentally upon the suffering of others. Even more have seen the damp dark cellblocks of political prisons, uncharged or tried, stripped of their families and lives for little more than a voice, a prayer, a hope. For years, Gaza has been the world’s largest open-air prison, one bounded on all sides by the hatred and terror of Israel and the complicity of its partner in cruelty–Egypt. But a short recast reminds us it is no stranger to Israeli war crimes.

With an opening salvo on December 27, 2008, Israel bombed the main police headquarters in Gaza City, killing 42 cadets standing in formation–none bearing weapons. Later it blew up 18 other police stations throughout the Gaza Strip. In total, 248 police officers were killed having not fired a single shot at Israeli forces. Over the twenty-one days that followed, Israel deliberately targeted civilians and civilian infrastructure and made widespread use of prohibited weapons, such as white phosphorous, in highly populated areas in clear violation of international law. During the onslaught, Israel targeted 23 U.N. buildings and/or compounds killing numerous civilians who had taken shelter there. In the deadliest case, 43 civilians were killed by an Israeli shelling of one such compound. Palestinian schools were also targeted. On January 5, an aerial strike killed three men who had sought shelter at the Asma Elementary Co-Ed A School. Twelve days later, a military ordinance struck the Beit Lahia Elementary School while it was being used as an emergency shelter… killing two young boys and injuring 13 others. Human Rights Watch documented at least seven instances where Israeli soldiers executed civilians… including five women and four children who were standing together waving white flags to convey they posed no threat. In another incident, Israeli soldiers shot and killed several members of the al-Najar family in Khuza’a village, east of Khan Yunis. Following orders from soldiers to leave their neighborhood, and while waving white flags, Rawiya al-Najjar and her family were gunned down. When the carnage ended, some 1440 Palestinians were killed and more than 5,000 injured… most of them civilians. According to the Israeli Human Rights group B’Tselem, 252 minors under the age of 16 (boys and girls) who did not take part in any fighting were killed along with 111 women and girls over 16.

Five years later, in the summer of 2014, the world was reminded of what it is to be a Palestinian in the crosshairs of a colonial fiend hell-bent on relegating them en masse to the ranks of the disappeared. During Israel’s unhinged six-week rampage it dropped 40,000 tons of explosives on more than 5200 “targets” throughout Gaza. At its end, some 2200 Palestinians were slaughtered, including 550 children, with some 10,000 others injured. Almost all the victims were civilians. More than 1900 children were orphaned, and hundreds of thousands were internally displaced with 20,000 homes, 26 NGO service providers, a half-dozen UNRWA facilities, 23 hospitals and health-care facilities, 133 schools, 360 factories, and 50,000 acres of croplands destroyed or damaged by Israel. Half of Gaza’s poultry stock was slaughtered along with thousands of family pets.

These are but a few of the more glaring examples of the recent yet unbroken mayhem long unleashed by Israel against a Palestinian community that never left its roots or lost the call of its collective claim. To keep track of this havoc is to bear witness to unspeakable crimes typically against the frail, the young, the passive who carry hope and horror-not weapons. According to Save the Children in the run-up to the most recent explosion, 2023 had already proved to be the deadliest year for Palestinian children since records began with at least 38 of them killed by Israeli forces in the occupied West Bank. That number has increased exponentially over the last several days with, it has been reported, some 500 additional children killed in Gaza. The Defense for Children International, a Palestinian human rights organization focused on child rights, reports that since 2005 major Israeli military offensives have killed more than 1,000 children in the 140 square mile prison of Gaza.

Meanwhile, there are some 5,200 Palestinians in Israeli prisons including 33 women and 170 children held largely on what are described as “security grounds.” Detained essentially indefinitely, they never see the inside of an Israeli civilian courtroom with the benefit of meaningful counsel, and the rights to due process and a trial. For them, it is very much a military star chamber–one overseen by a military judge and a military prosecutor with endless six-month detention extensions absent any cap, or established evidence of criminal wrongdoing.

In the most recent battle, the list of dead and injured civilians continues to grow on both sides and must stop. Yet the narrative of what has happened and why is no less destructive. No matter how many times politicians and theists of all callings seek to control and market the account by blaming Hamas and victimizing Israelis alone, even a cursory search establishes it is an obscene escape from reality. Long before Hamas arrived, Palestinians of all faiths, politics and aspirations fought against the expulsion, hatred and violence forced upon them by European terrorists in the name of a desperate historical rewrite. One which sought and continues to justify ongoing ethnic cleansing as so much an absolute historical rite of passage–a claim that defies the reality of time and long-settled decency and humanitarian law.

Tragically, after all the millennium we still live in times not unlike the dark march of history where struggles are judged not by the equal application of international law or the will and wail of justice but by the color of one’s skin, the echo of one’s words, the pose of one’s prayer. All too often, the scale of righteousness is weighted not by the credence of the cause but the partisan of one’s cheer. A double standard at best, it is a jury of institutional inequality–one that passes judgment not by the virtuous but the powerful; not by equal application of law but the coercive command of presence. It is specious posturing at its finest; an opportune script sculpted by occupiers across the globe, and not the occupied. It must stop.

Until the community of onlookers imposes the same standards upon colonizer as they do the colonized; upon Jews and Christians as they do Muslims; on skin tones of white as they do of color, the history of yesterday and that unfolding before us today remains locked in a dismissal falsified story-line. Ultimately, that description instills upon us all the bleak chronicle that the difference between “freedom fighter” and “terrorist” is not the justness of the cause … but who wins.

Stanley L. Cohen is lawyer and activist in New York City.

Weapons of Mass Lies

Maryam Namazie An Open Letter From Iranian And Afghan Women, International Lawyers And Global Women Leaders Urging Countries To Recognize The Crime Of Gender Apartheid.



One Law for All Spokesperson Maryam Namazie joins a coalition of female lawyers, judges, activists and other global leaders to name the atrocities against the women and girls of Iran and Afghanistan for what they are: Gender Apartheid. 

This effort is being led by legal experts who are pursuing a path to have Gender Apartheid recognised as a crime against humanity in international law in the same way that Racial Apartheid has been recognised. You can learn more and sign onto the campaign here.

As a diverse coalition of Iranian and Afghan women leaders, international legal practitioners, activists and other stakeholders, we are calling on states to recognize the crime of gender apartheid to counteract and eventually end the systems of gender apartheid currently in place in the Islamic Republic of Iran, and in Afghanistan under the Taliban.

The Islamic Republic of Iran and the Taliban in Afghanistan are often described as “gender apartheid” regimes for their treatment of women as second-class citizens under law and policy. However, apartheid standards in international law, developed primarily in the 20th century, were designed to address racial apartheid.

Apartheid comes from the Afrikaans word for “apart.” The term was born out of apartheid South Africa, and its system of institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination, which sought to establish and maintain dominance by white South Africans over black South Africans. That system eventually came to an end, in part because of decades of pressure and isolation from international actors through shaming and severing diplomatic and economic relations.

While representing a distinct form of apartheid from that in South Africa, the components of systematic segregation and subjugation that make up apartheid are also present in Afghanistan and Iran today.

Under the Taliban, women in Afghanistan are banned from education, employment in NGOs and in government, and from traveling long distances without a male guardian, all while having to abide by a severe dress code. 

In the Islamic Republic of Iran, women are banned from many fields of study, sporting events, and from obtaining a passport and traveling outside the country without their husband’s permission. Women’s lives and their testimony are worth half a man under the law and they are forced to wear compulsory hijab. These bans, and the broader legal systems they belong to, seek to establish and maintain women’s subjugation to men, and the State. Violation of these laws can lead to violence, imprisonment, and death.

Looking to the example of the international community’s condemnation of apartheid South Africa, women living in Iran and Afghanistan are requesting similarly internationalized responses to end the gender apartheid regimes they are subject to. In order to fully realize the goals of the woman-led revolution in Iran and to support the courageous defiance of Afghan women who have had their rights brutally stripped away, the international community must properly recognize the harms of a legally enshrined system in which women are treated as second-class citizens and acknowledge this not only through condemnation but through effective, concerted action.

The situations in the Islamic Republic of Iran and under the Taliban in Afghanistan are not simply cases of gender discrimination. Rather, these systems are perpetuating a more extreme, systematic and structural war against women designed to dehumanize and repress them for purposes of entrenching power.

Our chief demands to governments:

  1. amplify and center the experiences of women in Iran and Afghanistan living under gender apartheid,
  2. make statements, issue resolutions and shape other policy responses to condemn the gender apartheid regimes in Iran and Afghanistan, and
  3. interpret and/or expand the legal definition of apartheid under international and national laws to include severe forms of institutionalized gender-based discrimination.

Maryam Namazie is an Iranian-born activist and Spokesperson of the
Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and One Law for All.

Crime Of Gender Apartheid

Maryam Namazie ✊ with commentary on those citizens in Iran refusing to genuflect before the country's morality police. 



Maryam Namazie is an Iranian-born activist and Spokesperson 
of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and One Law for All.

Kill Us If You Dare

Maryam Namazie My Interview Today With Carole Walker On #Iran #Womensrevolution, Time Radio, 27 October 2022 #Mahsaamini.



Maryam Namazie is an Iranian-born activist and Spokesperson 
of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and One Law for All.

Heartbreaking Number Of Young People Killed

Only Sky ✒ ✑ In 2017, a judge named Ebrahim Raisi emerged from relative obscurity to run for the presidency of Iran. 

By Kaveh Mousavi

Despite being a new arrival in the national consciousness, he garnered more than 38% of the vote, losing to incumbent President Rouhani. In 2021, Raisi won the presidency in a highly controversial election with 62% of the vote.

Despite being the current president and most likely successor to the top job in Iran—the Supreme Leader—Raisi remains largely unknown outside of this country. I haven’t seen any in-depth or even accurate reporting on the man.

As a concerned Iranian citizen and a close watcher of politics here and abroad, I would like to rectify that strange silence.

Before he ran for president in 2017, Raisi held many high-ranking positions in the judiciary but shied away from the press and rarely made the news. For those of us familiar with the history of Iran, however, his name was familiar and associated with a very traumatic episode in our history. Ebrahim Raisi was one of the four people tasked with carrying out the massacre of political prisoners in the 1980s, which saw thousands of people executed in sham unjust trials.

Continue reading @ Only Sky.

The Banality Of Evil ✑ Meet Iran’s Probable Next Supreme Leader

Maryam Namazie ✒ last month sharing her views on the struggle in Iran against theocracy. 

Maryam Namazie is an Iranian-born activist and Spokesperson 
of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and One Law for All.

Maryam Namazie On Iran’s Women’s Revolution

Maryam Namazieforecasts an end to the rule of the theocrats in Iran.

 


Maryam Namazie is an Iranian-born activist and Spokesperson 
of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and One Law for All.

Islamic Regime Of Iran Will End With Women's Revolution

Maryam Namazie Protesters in Cologne, Germany, were met with aggressive heckling by a group of young Muslims on September 10.

13-September-2022

A video posted by Maryam Namazie, a London-based Iranian writer and activist, showed the counter-protesters shouting “Allahu Akbar.” Namazie and her groups protested against Iran, sentencing LGBTQ activists Zahra Sedighi-Hamadani and Elham Chobdar to death.

According to Iran’s Urmia Revolutionary Court, the two were charged with “Corruption on Earth.” They were found guilty of promoting homosexuality which caused outrage in the international LGBTQ and human rights organizations.

In an interview with the Atheist Republic News Team, Namazie said she was about to give a speech when the incident happened. “I was holding an Allah is a Woman sign,” she said. It was just one of the signs that the protesters were holding.

She explained that most of the signs in the protests were in support of Zahra and Elham.

“They saw the sign, and that’s when they started shouting Allahu Akbar,” Namazie explained. The protest was held in the Domplatte, the square surrounding the Cologne Cathedral. The protesters know that there are a lot of tourists and locals passers-by, Namazie said.

We tried explaining what the protest is about, but they were more offended about the sign than about the lives that will be lost. Here are two people whose lives will be lost, and we are doing our best to save them, but they are more outraged at the sign instead of the blatant human rights abuse and oppression of the LGBTQ.

Police had to be called after one of the protesters was hit by the hecklers.

According to Namazie, she and her team are doing their best to help the activists in Iran. “We need everyone to step-up in their defense until we can have their freedom,” she said. They are doing their best to bring attention to this case and are working with other human rights and LGBTQ organizations to appeal Iran’s ruling.

Other human rights organizations quickly moved to Zahra and Elham’s defense.

6Rang, a German-based Iranian LGBTI rights group, slammed Iran’s ruling, calling it “unfair and unclear.” Shadi Amin, the group’s coordinator, said they are pressuring the German government to intervene.

“This is the first time that a woman has been sentenced to death in Iran for her sexual orientation,” Amin said.


Maryam Namazie is an Iranian-born activist and Spokesperson 
of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and One Law for All.


Protest For Iranian Lesbians On Death Row Met With Allah-U-Akbar In Cologne

Gearóid Ó Loingsigh ✒ with a piece that featured in Socialist Democracy.

Thousands of Iranian women took to the streets to protest against the hijab law in Tehran in the spring of 1979

Women in Iran, and indeed many men, are in open revolt against the reactionary theocracy following the murder of a young woman, by the Morality Police. That even such a force exists, should tell you everything you need to know about the case. Yet it is undoubtedly something many liberals and erstwhile socialists would prefer to go away as their past record is one of appeasement to Islamists and the silencing of feminists who dare to speak out.

In 2015, an Iranian feminist Maryam Namazie was invited to speak at Goldsmith’s university. Her talk was interrupted by the Islamic Society, who switched off her power point presentation and shouted “Safe Space” at her. Safe Spaces are one of the woke fads where students are “safe” from other ideas. There was no safe space for Maryam Namazie, who required some guarantees of physical safety.

A similar situation arose in Ireland around the same time. She was invited to speak at Trinity College Dublin by the Society for International Affairs on the topic of Apostasy and the Rise of Islam. The SoFIA cancelled the event following her refusal to agree to a number of last-minute restrictions that were placed upon her.(1) She was informed by the college security, not known to be a normal reference point on academic matters, that it would show up the college as being one sided and antagonistic towards Muslims.(2) First they told her that the event would no longer be open to the public and a moderator would be nominated for the event. The Wokerati do not like women speaking out for themselves. They have to be controlled, just like they are in Iran. The moderator was Dr Andrew Pierce, a theologian. Hardly, a great starting point for challenging theocracy. Some of those involved in this affair went on to become apparatchiks in that well known bastion of progressive thought called Fine Gael, which probably says a lot.

They had no such qualms about inviting Sheikh Kamal El Mekki, a man who advocates the death penalty for apostasy and stoning for adultery. He was allowed speak with no restrictions, with no one moderating his reactionary fervour.(3) Just to be clear what it is that he stands for. Apostasy is something that exists in many religions, including Catholicism. It is where a person turns their back on their religion for another one, or worse still, becomes an atheist, something many of the readers of this article are probably guilty of. So, he believes in executing you for what you believe. Stoning adulterers is another issue for reactionaries. He almost certainly means the stoning of women who have committed adultery and not men. He was on disputed ground. Some Islamic scholars argue that there is no prescribed punishment for apostasy in the Qu’ran and the punishments referred to are in the afterlife. Likewise, stoning is not the recommended punishment for adultery, rather it is 100 lashes.(4) Not a nice idea either, but the point is that El Mekki is just one view within Islam and a controversial one, at that. Yet he was treated with kid gloves. As Maryam Namazie pointed out.

It is unsettling because these people are given free access to a campus, while those who oppose violence and speak out against the violation of rights of non-Muslims and Muslims alike have restrictions placed on them,” said Ms Namazie, who was invited to speak in part because of Mr El Mekki's lecture.
No conditions were placed on his talk, nor was there threats to cancel his event over concerns that his position on death for apostates would ‘antagonise’ ex-Muslim and Muslim students who do not support apostasy laws.
If you criticise the Islamist movement, which is a far right political movement, you are seen as attacking ordinary Muslims - and this is not the case. Muslims are not a homogenous group.(5)

The SoFIA eventually put out a statement saying it was all a misunderstanding on Namazie’s part. A statement that had to be approved, as sleights of hand normally require some forethought. She eventually spoke at Trinity, under the auspices of the Philosophy Society, some seven months later.

This is not surprising, liberals and sections of the left bought into identity politics a long time ago. In the world of identity politics an entirely subjective hierarchy of suffering is established, which goes along with a hierarchy of the right to complain, take offence and demand that others kowtow to your ideas and view of yourself. It is as clear as day, that in this hierarchy, women are at the bottom of the pile, and within that group Lesbians are even further down the list of priorities. It is not that long ago that groups such as the SWP were running round, not defending a woman’s right to wear what she wanted, including the hijab and other Islamic head covering,(6) but were actively encouraging women to do so. They claimed it was progressive and anti-imperialist. Any Muslim woman should be able to wear head coverings if she wants, and to not do so, if she doesn’t. But it is symbol of religious alienation and the oppression of women and no socialist should be actively encouraging it.

So, it was only to be expected that they would try to have their cake and eat it too, in the midst of this revolt. The headline on their article said People revolt. It is true that the protests have gone beyond women, and include many men, but it was not a good idea to ignore that this began as a women’s protest. They then try to downplay the question of head coverings, quoting an Iranian academic, Peyman Jafari, to lend credence to their position. He states that:

There has been a growing mood among younger generations that they do not want state interference in their daily life, their social lives.

This does not mean that they are anti-religious or against the hijab. It’s really about the freedom of wearing it or not wearing it. I was talking to a friend who is joining the protests and has a hijabi mother who is supporting her. Lots of these women will have mothers, grandmas, aunts, friends even who will wear the hijab.

So, this crosses the line of being religious or non-religious. It’s about the freedom of wearing what you want.(7)

Not all the women are non-religious of course, most of them would consider themselves to be Muslims, but it is not merely about the freedom to wear what you want. There is an adage that when you are in a hole, you should stop digging. The SWP clearly aims to come out at the antipodes, so much so, they have even moved rightwards from their original position supporting Salman Rushdie to basically trying to brush their former support for him under the carpet.(8) They now find themselves in an embarrassing situation with the revolt in Iran and many liberals, like our Wokerati also find themselves batting on a sticky wicket. Broadly they would claim to support women’s demands, though their practice would indicate that this is not the case.

So now we have Iranian women rebelling. And what do our liberals say? Who do they stand by? You can’t support the women of Iran and the stifling of voices like Namazie’s. This should be a simple issue and yet it is not, for some. On September 13th the Iranian Morality Police murdered a young woman, Mahsa Amini, because her head covering did not meet their standards. Protests erupted throughout Iran and led to street style parties where women burned their head coverings. The protests have gone beyond that, have spread to numerous cities and have also seen young men come out in protest.

There are various responses to these protests. There are those right-wing elements gleefully awaiting the collapse of the regime hoping for it to be replaced by a more pro-western one. There are the liberals who don’t know what to think and then there are the standard Tankies who think there is something progressive about the theocracy in power and see the hand of the CIA in everything. There is no doubt that the CIA would like to take advantage of any unrest in Iran, but that is not the same as saying that the protests are just a CIA subterfuge, though the 1953 coup organised by the CIA started off as protests engineered against the democratically elected government of Dr. Mossadegh. They are not the same however. The theocracy has ruled through a combination of popular support in some sectors and repression, including the torture and murder of oppositionists within Iran. And whilst it has not lost all support, the regime is not exactly popular amongst the working class. There have been waves of strikes in Iran in recent years.

There is of course, another position and that is that the Iranian people have the right to rise up against the repressive theocracy, just like they did against the Shah. Iranian women do not need to pass some test of political correctness and conformity to identity politics in the West in order to have their rights affirmed.

It is often forgotten that the Iranian revolution was a very heterogenous affair. The Islamists were not the only political force involved. Other forces were present, the Tudeh (Communist Party) was quite large but in following with its political position, sought an alliance with the national bourgeoisie and let Khomeini get the upper hand till he turned on them in 1983. There was also the Fedayeen and Mojahedeen and the National Front (despite the name, nothing to do with the fascists organisations in Europe that also used that name). The social bases of these organisations did not disappear and have remained active in Iran, though the organisations have since disappeared.

Even the Islamists acknowledged the issues the led to the collapse of the Shah’s regime. It was not a simple Islamic event, a moment of religious fervour. The Iranian revolution was quite different from many of the Islamic movements that have arisen since.

An article entitled “Fifty Years of Treason” written by Abul-Hassan Bani-Sadr, the future president of the Islamic Republic, it indicted the regime on fifty separate counts of political, economic, cultural, and social wrongdoings. These included: the coup d’état of 1921 as well as that of 1953; trampling the fundamental laws and making a mockery of the Constitutional Revolution; granting capitulations reminiscent of nineteenth-century colonialism; forming military alliances with the West; murdering opponents and shooting down unarmed protestors, especially in June 1963; purging patriotic officers from the armed forces; opening up the economy – especially the agricultural market – to foreign agrobusinesses; establishing a one-party state with a cult of personality; highjacking religion and taking over religious institutions; undermining national identity by spreading “cultural imperialism”; cultivating “fascism” by propagating shah-worship, racism, Aryanism, and anti-Arabism; and, most recently, establishing a one-party state with the intention of totally dominating society. “These fifty years,” the article exclaimed, “contain fifty counts of treason.”(9)

So, it is not surprising that many participated in the overthrow of the Shah, for reasons other than religion. In fact, many women took part in the protests that led up to the revolution. Photos from the period clearly show masses of women in the streets taking part in protests and not a head covering to be seen anywhere. But the so-called modernisation of Iran under the Shah, had more to do with projecting an image to the West than changing the reality of women’s lives in the country. There has never been a golden period for Iranian women and the Shah didn’t treat them well either.

Many of the demands centred around social justice and it is no accident that most of the dead in the revolution came from working class areas. The provisional government set up after the revolution was headed initially by Bazargan and other veterans from the Mossadegh government that was overthrown by the CIA in 1953, whilst in the shadows the Revolutionary Council comprised of clerics prepared the final blow.(10) They won, side-lining and outmanoeuvring the more democratic and even secular currents.

Khomeini and the regime maintained power in the first years through land distribution, giving some 850,000 hectares to some 220,000 peasants and using oil revenues to finance electrification, drinking water, health care, seeing a dramatic rise in life expectancy.(11) It also subsidised food for the working class and reduced the working week.(12)

The clerics who came out on top, now face the same situation the Shah faced. Deep unpopularity amongst the working class, economic crisis, waves of protests and the need to use harsh repression as the only means of keeping people in check. Given the nature of the theocratic regime and its brutal treatment of women, it is perhaps not that surprising that its repression of women would be a spark that would lead to yet another challenge to the regime. Its ability to buy off the rural and urban poor is in doubt and it never had anything to offer women. Absolutely nothing.

Women’s fortunes have waxed and waned under the theocracy. Immediately after the revolution, mandatory laws on head covering were reintroduced, (they had existed under the Shah also for a long period) the regime then moved to exclude women from various posts such as the judiciary. There have been periods in which rules on female employment were relaxed, but the regime never ceased to be an entirely reactionary misogynistic regime.

So, our woke friends, erstwhile revolutionaries of the SWP et al are in a quandary. If they support the protests, they have to explain their past positions and risk alienating those reactionaries they cuddled up to in the name of identity politics. Also, if they accept that the oppression of women is an issue, they would have to explain why it is not ok for Iranian women to be oppressed in Iran, but it is ok if those same women turn up in Britain to be put down, in order to curry favour with religious fanatics. They do agree with these fanatics on some points.

Iran is a country where homosexuals can be imprisoned and even executed and yet it is one of the two trans surgery capitals in the world, Pakistan being the other one, where the official position is similar to that of gender reassignment clinics: lets trans the gay away! Identity politics not only means refusing to let women from a Muslim background speak, lest you offend fundamentalists, but also denying that women exist and any man can be one.

The people who promoted head coverings, indulged fundamentalists and attacked JK Rowling are all the same people. Cowards, misogynists and generally speaking, anti-working class. Women’s rights are women’s rights, to be defended at all times and do not play second fiddle to myriad identities not to be offended, be they religious nuts or trans activists.


Notes

(1) Namazie, M. (23/03/2015) Trinity College Dublin: Behind The Arras https://maryamnamazie.com/tcd-2/

(2) Kearns, D. (23/03/2015) Activist pulls out of Trinity College talk due to ‘restrictions’ aimed at not ‘antagonising’ Muslims https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/activist-pulls-out-of-trinity-college-talk-due-to-restrictions-aimed-at-not-antagonising-muslims-31087977.html

(3) Ibíd.,

(4) See Should an Apostate be Killed? https://islamonline.net/en/should-an-apostate-be-killed/

(5) Kearns, D. (23/03/2015) op. cit.

(6) Though the term hijab is used in the West to refer to all sorts of Islamic head coverings, there are in fact many different types, covering more or less of the face and greater in extension. The common types worn in Iran are the Shayla and the Chador.

(7) Clark, N. (22/09/2022) People revolt after Iranian police murder woman https://socialistworker.co.uk/international/people-revolt-after-iranian-police-murder-young-woman/

(8) Cooper, M. (08/08/2022) Thirty years since the Satanic Verses https://workersliberty.org/story/2022-08-08/thirty-years-satanic-verses

(9) Abrahamian, E. (2008) A History of Modern Iran. New York. CUP para 22.6 (epub format)

(10) Ibíd., para 22.16

(11) Ibíd., para 22.41

(12) Ibíd., para.22.42


⏩ Gearóid Ó Loingsigh is a political and human rights activist in Latin America.

Iranian Women’s Revolt, The Left And Liberals

One Law For All ✒ Outrage over the murder of 22 year old Mahsa Amini for ‘improper veiling’ has sparked unprecedented protests across Iran and the world. 

The slogans of these protests include: ‘We don’t want an Islamic government,’ ➖‘We don’t want an anti-women government,’ and ‘Woman, Life, Freedom.’ Images of women taking the lead, removing and burning their veils, united with men against the Islamic regime have inspired the world.

On 1 October, we call on you to join a global day of solidarity with the courageous protestors. In London, the protest begins at 2pm in Trafalgar Square. Please come and stand with those challenging theocracy of which compulsory veiling is a pillar.

There are many other things you can do, such as highlighting the protests and mobilising solidarity, including by using hashtags #MahsaAmina #WomensRevolution #IranProtests and by putting pressure on governments to politically boycott the Islamic regime of Iran.

For more information, on protests, see ‘This is a woman’s revolution in the making,’ which includes an interview with our Spokesperson Maryam Namazie. Also see:

Maryam Namazie Explains What’s Been Happening in Iran? Sunday Scoop with Harris and Sultan

Maryam Namazie with Andrew Castle on LBC Radio on Mahsa Amini and Iran Protests

Maryam Namazie interview with John Pienaar

Protest for Iranian Lesbians on death row met with shouts of Allahu Akbar in Cologne

Protesters against the death sentences of lesbian activists Zahra Sedighi-Hamadani and Elham Chobdar in Iran were met with aggressive shouts of Allahu Akbar on September 10. The two women were found guilty of promoting homosexuality but the aggressive hecklers were more concerned with our signs than the lives of these two women. You can read more about it here.

Please sign a petition to help save the two who are facing execution for who they love. #LoveIsNotACrime

Maryam Namazie wins IBKA’s Sapio Award

IBKA, the International League of Non-Religious and Atheists, awarded Maryam Namazie its Sapio Prize for outstanding merits in advocating freethought, separation of state and church, and rational thinking in Cologne, Germany on 10 September 2022. Find out more here.

⏩ Keep Up With One Law For All.

Join 1 October Protests In Solidarity With Brave Women And Men In Iran Who Have Inspired The World

Maryam Namazie - Iranian atheist Soheil Arabi who was on death row for blasphemy and is currently in internal exile after 8 years in prison in Iran was awarded the Freethought Champions Award at Celebrating Dissent 2022 organised by Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and Freethought Lebanon.

In his acceptance video, he said:

I have no regrets that I have been in prison for 8 years, despite the fact that I have lost my health because I think we have paved the way collectively together for liberation. I am a drop in this sea and glad to be part of the society of enlightenment.

 He added:

When one is not free, then you cannot have a normal and meaningful life, you cannot choose; women cannot choose their dress, men cannot even decide on the shape of their beard. We were dead already; we are trying to be alive again.

  See Maryam Namazie’s interview with Soheil Arabi on the situation of atheists in Iran.

Transcript of the Interview is below:

Maryam Namazie:
Soheil Arabi, it’s an honour to have you with us. Congratulations on the Freethinkers’ Award at Celebrating Dissent 2022.

Tell us about your personal circumstances, as well as your mother’s who bravely campaigned on your behalf. You were in prison for 8 years for apostasy, freethinking and for defending political prisoners. You are now in internal exile in Iran.

Soheil Arabi: Hello. I am also very pleased to be with you. I must say that freethinkers, new thinkers and dissidents here in Iran are all in a prison and facing torture. Some prison torture chambers have the signs “Prison” at its gates but other places have no visible sign. From very beginning of becoming an atheist, apostates are subject to mistreatment by their family, school, university and society at large. As soon as we begin to express our opinion, certainly the torture and mistreatment intensifies and our task becomes more difficult.

In my 8 years in prison, nothing was new. The only difference was that it was formally called a prison. Really from the day we become apostates, the torture against us starts. In prison, this is more formal.

As far as my mother is concerned, she has been sentenced to imprisonment for defending me and when I was sentenced to death, she suffered a heart attack. Recently, she also suffered a brain haemorrhage when she was called for interrogation. Putting pressure on the families of political prisoners has become part and parcel of the prisoner’s torture, unfortunately.

Maryam Namazie: I am sorry to hear. Please convey our warmest wishes to your mother and family. She has given all of us courage for the support she has given you and other political prisoners. You mentioned the pressures on you and your family. This is reality of life for freethinkers and dissidents who are living in Iran. You have worked hard both inside the prison and now whilst in internal exile, to expose prison conditions of freethinkers imprisoned in the Islamic regime of Iran. Would you give more details about their conditions in prison in Iran?

Soheil Arabi: There are many types of political prisoners in Iran and the treatment and pressure on them is different. For example, those who want reform but still believe in an Islamic regime receive lesser sentences and their treatment is different in prison compared to those who completely oppose the ideology of the government and those who are secular and believe that rules and laws should be earthly not divine. Those who believe in fundamental changes suffer many more tortures if they are not executed. Execution has become more difficult for the regime, not because they are more tolerant, but because people are supporting us. A decade ago, any apostate would be executed for declaring that they have left Islam. Fortunately, support from the people and international support have led to slight improvements in the situation. Pressure on the atheist prisoner is much more than on anyone else, more than pressure on a murderer or someone who has undertaken a major fraud or someone who has planted a bomb. For example, when I was sentenced to death, my mother asked the prosecutor “why do you want to execute my son? He has not killed anyone!” The prosecutor responded: “a murderer kills one person, where you son has murdered the government!” You see their view is that anyone who is engaged in enlightenment is killing a government. That is why they take the most severe revenge against the prisoner.

Maryam Namazie: You point out an important issue that enlightenment is important. It is a fact about Iranian society that freethinking, enlightenment and atheism have significantly grown. Why do you think this is happening and how does this reflect in prisons?

Soheil Arabi: The government is very much terrified of enlightenment. This is because the political economy of the Islamic regime is based on religion. If you take away religion from the Islamic regime, if you remove superstition, then the state cannot survive. A democratic system will replace it where there is no room for mullahs and Basijis. They will be replaced with specialists and experts. Therefore, the regime’s survival is based on maintaining superstition and they are frightened of enlightenment. Fortunately, despite dangers and difficulties, the enlightenment and legacy of generations before us and in particular with the social media, enlightenment has flourished in Iran and I can safely say that 80% of our young generation do not believe in these superstitions. You rarely see anyone who believes in the religion, prays or independently decides to wear the hijab. People despise the religious government and fortunately even those who previously believed in religion have today turned their backs on religion. Thanks to social media networks and enlightenment work and sacrifices that our friends have made in these years. In fact, the Achilles heel of this government is enlightenment, the more awareness there is among people the more difficult it is for a religious government based on superstition.

Maryam Namazie: You as the most famous atheist of Iran and I think one the famous atheists of the world. Despite all the dangers you face both in prison and currently in internal exile in Iran why would you still continue to carry on?

Soheil Arabi: I started this work with a blog called “A generation that no longer wants to be burnt!” because our generation and our previous generation were really burnt by the fire of religion and theocracy. All of our lives were endangered by religion. From our birth, they whispered Shahada in our ears. We have had no choice – not even control of our hairstyle, dress. We were robbed by religion. In short, our lives were burnt. The day we began to mutiny against this servitude, we said to ourselves that we may suffer but at least our children and the generation after us could possibly have a better life. Fortunately, we have so far succeeded. With our pens we have overcome the prison, hanging rope, truncheon and boots. With solidarity, our generation has overcome a thousand-year-old reactionary entity. I have no regrets that I have been in prison for 8 years, despite the fact that I have lost my health because I think we have paved the way collectively together for liberation. I am a drop in this sea and glad to be part of the society of enlightenment.

Maryam Namazie: You already responded to this in some ways but is it worth it?

Soheil Arabi: We had truly nothing to lose but our chains. We were turned into walking corpses. When one is not free, then you cannot have a normal and meaningful life, you cannot choose; women cannot choose their dress, men cannot even decide on the shape of their beard. We were dead already; we are trying to be alive again. Even if you want to see the individual benefit, it was worth it. Even though we viewed it as part of a moral question that one must protest injustice while alive; one should not be expected to live under indignity. This is a moral question that one should not live under indignity. Even if you look at it from an economic point of view benefit point of view, we were killed many times under this government’s rule. They had taken away our choices. Without our permission we have been assigned as Muslims and our right to leave religion removed. For this very reason we broke our chains and we did the right thing. If we kept silent, the burnt generations would have followed us. I am really pleased to have achieved this a lot sooner. When I was criticising religion relentlessly, I thought I would get executed and only after 50 or 100 years might it have in impact. However, and fortunately, because of unity and solidarity and the advantage offered us by the new technology, we have achieved our goals a lot sooner. The younger generation born two decades after us, have more enquiring minds and will not accept the religious peddlers, they are a thoughtful generation. This truly has given me relief.

Maryam Namazie: You earlier referred to the importance of freethinking and freedom of conscience and also the importance of the right to insult the sacred and apostasy for progress in a society. The more advanced a society, the more respect for freedom to think and conscience. In your view, what is the significance of criticising, ridiculing and challenging of these laws for Iran and freethinking in the world?

Soheil Arabi: It is important for this to become a global movement as this is not just an issue for the people of Iran, rather it is important for all of the Middle East; many places in the world are grappling with this issue.

The cost of iconoclasm is very high; is a matter of life and death. If we turn this into a global movement and if we succeed to turn it into a right for people across the world to have the right to criticise, mock and question everything, we would certainly have a better world in the future and life would be easier for all of us.

Islam and generally theocracy has many victims and its wining card has been prohibition of questioning. When we were children, any question to the religious teacher would be met with physical punishment and ridiculed. They would put a rubbish bin on our head to teach us a lesson and threaten us. Questioning has been banned in Iran; insulting the sacred is prohibited. Although we have paid a great price with many executed and imprisoned, but we have to a great extent broken the taboo!

I think the solution is to turn this into a global movement and create a base and support for atheists and freethinking prisoners via global protest and activity to turn this into a practical right for everyone across the world to be able to challenge anything and have the right not to have a religion and to leave a religion. These are important for our plan for the future whilst the problem still remains.

Maryam Namazie: You mentioned that the support you received in Iran and globally helped you while in prison and saved you from certain death. What is the significance of this solidarity and unity and what message do you have for those who can hear you. What can they do?

Soheil Arabi: When I was arrested and sentenced to death in 2013, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps unit published a plan to fight atheists. A number of people were executed. Some were members of “The Campaign to Remember” or Facebook activists who were exposing and mocking the sacred as a means of enlightenment. Many were executed or given long term sentences. In that year I was sentenced to death, Ali Rastani was executed at that very time for asking simple questions.

I remember whilst in interrogation, they used to beat me severely and when I was becoming unconscious, I could hear the head torturer saying – “don’t kill him here; he should be hanged legally so he becomes a lesson for others not to mock our Imans and insult the sacred.” They had a clear plan to carry out the execution legally to use it as media propaganda. Fortunately, this happened at the time that Twitter had become prevalent and social media was used extensively in Iran and we were lucky that we managed to send information out and people were very supportive. There were a number of Twitter campaigns that came to the attention of the public and the people of the world responded. From that moment, the prison authorities and officials changed their approach. Previously it was with threats, but now they were trying to make me confess that I was on the US’ payroll and receiving funding to justify my execution. Since they failed to force me make to a false confession and under immense public and international pressure they said they would commute the death sentence but wanted me to refrain from engaging and the media. They were petrified of people’s united and coordinated protest about my plight. This certainly made it costly for the authorities.

The security forces have two strategies. Firstly, to stamp out and suppress any opposing or dissenting voice by making people fearful; the other strategy is led by more pragmatic approach to minimise the cost and risk for the regime. Where there is extensive and widespread support the second strategy group will become a dominate approach to reduce the cost and risk for the government. Extensive and coordinated support and if it becomes a global response certainly has an impact. We currently have Yousef Mehrdad and Sadolah Fazeli at risk of execution on charges of insulting the representative of god and leader of the Islamic regime. They are in Arak city torture chambers and are suffering hard times. Sexual assault, rape and torture are used against political prisoners and the prisoners face a really harsh and difficult condition for working for enlightenment. We therefore must work together to support them and make it really costly for the regime to suppress freethinkers. One very useful way is to use social media, particularly international protest and coordinated Twitter action to engage all the world.

Maryam Namazie: Thank you Soheil Arabi for talking to us and congratulations again on your award.

Soheil Arabi: Thank you. I accept this award on behalf of all the brave women who fighting compulsory veiling and all the mothers who are supporting their children and to all of those people who are fighting this injustice and hope very soon we get rid of these oppressors!

Maryam Namazie is an Iranian-born activist and Spokesperson 
of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and One Law for All.

Iranian Atheist Soheil Arabi Wins Freethought Champions Award At Celebrating Dissent

Maryam Namazie - With the news that Nazanin is home, we at FiLiA wish to start by offering our love and solidarity to Nazanin, Richard, Gabriella and their family.
 
We also welcome Anoosheh Ashoori and send love to his daughter Elika Ashoori and family. Since reports first started circling that Nazanin and Annosheh were at the airport in Tehran we were on tenterhooks waiting for the news that they had arrived safely home. To know that they are back – it’s hard to find the words to describe.

Last year when Richard’s hunger strike began – another attempt to do something, anything, to make this government take notice – we thought ‘what can we do to help?’. It was Margaret Owen OBE who planted the seed of an idea during our podcast episode with her. Here was a formidable Human Rights lawyer, an 89-year-old woman who has dedicated her life to helping others, continuing Richard’s hunger strike with one of her own. If she could do it, maybe we could?

We launched the FiLiA #Women4Nazanin solidarity action: a chain of women fasting, with one aim in mind – to show Nazanin that women everywhere stood with her, and that we would not forget her; we would be beside her until she was free.

On the 20th December 2021, Maryam Namazie (an Iranian-born writer and campaigner) along with FiLiA CEO Lisa-Marie were the first to pick up the baton. We put the call out to our sisters around the world and they answered. That evening, as we spoke outside Downing Street at the Christmas carol concert arranged by supporters of Nazanin, we were able to share the astonishing news that in less than 24 hours, over 500 women had signed up to fast. By the time we went to bed that evening, it was over 700. Today 1,173 women have signed up in total, taking us to 24th March 2025. We had hoped we would be able to tell some of those women that they didn’t have to fast; that Nazanin was home. To be able to tell over a thousand of them is wonderful!

Southall Black Sisters CEO Pragna Patel said beautifully outside Downing Street: ‘To fight for one woman’s freedom is to fight for our own’. Pragna went on to state that we can no longer afford to remain bystanders to political injustice in the face of authoritarian and compassionless forces of fear division and hatred.

Another of the #Women4Nazanin fasters, the Women’s Rights Activist Sophie Walker wrote that Nazanin was caught between men playing politics; a tool in their war games and as leverage for a debt. To tear a mother from her child is one of the cruellest tortures that one can inflict, and the callous indifference shown by this government has been shocking.

One by one, woman by woman, the seeds of solidarity were spread through fasting until Nazanin arrived home. Our fast may now be over, but the Sisterhood that has grown will continue in our work to put an end to using families as pawns in war games.

I can’t tell you how happy I am to hear that Nazanin is home where she belongs after six long years. This is truly a day of celebration. As we said all along, Nazanin was a hostage. The trumped-up charges quickly disappeared once the UK government paid off its debts to Iran. The question now is who will pay the debt of justice owed to the many other dual nationals and political prisoners still held by Iran? Women political prisoners like labour activist Sepideh Gholiyan who is gravely ill and being denied medical care, civil rights lawyer Soheila Hejab, Kurdish activist Zeynab Jalalian, sentenced to life in prison for enmity against God, Golrokh Iraee Ebrahimi who has been in prison since 2014 for an unpublished manuscript condemning stoning, Yasaman Aryani, initially sentenced to 16 years in prison for being unveiled and distributing flowers for International Women’s Day” – Maryam Namazie, British-Iranian Human Rights Activist.  

As always, women will roll up their sleeves and get to work, picking up the pieces of male violence.

Welcome home Nazanin!

In Sisterhood and Solidarity.

Maryam Namazie is an Iranian-born activist and Spokesperson 
of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and One Law for All.

Nazanin Is Free

Maryam Namazie ✒ #Iran regime referred To International Criminal Court for its war crimes in #Syria.

22-February-2022

Iran Human Rights Documentation Center and UK barrister Haydee Dijkstal have filed a request to the International Criminal Court to open an examination into the Islamic regime of Iran’s role in war crimes in Syria. 

Clearly, the Russian, US and Turkish governments have played a role but the focus on Iran is crucial given its crimes as documented by Syrian refugees in Jordan. Their being in Jordan is key, given that the Iranian and Syrian regimes are not parties to the Rome Statute that established the International Criminal Court but Jordan is which permits the request under international law.

It is common knowledge that the regime has provided combat troops and spent tens of billions of dollars to arm, train and equip Assad’s forces as well as Iran-back militia groups such as the Lebanese Hezbollah in order to suppress the revolution and safeguard Asad’s regime.

What’s important, though, is that this is the first attempt to hold the Iranian regime accountable in an international court for its crimes in Syria. It also crucially highlights the extent of the regime’s war crimes, including in helping to suppress protests and oversee the torture and execution of opponents in Syrian prisons, as well as starving populations and forcibly displacing them.

This latest attempt is a continuation of demands for accountability and justice, including via people’s courts such as the Iran and Aban Tribunals. It is one more testament to the decades of the regime’s crimes against people in Iran, Syria, Iraq and elsewhere. Crimes that will not be forgiven or forgotten.

Maryam Namazie is an Iranian-born activist and Spokesperson 
of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and One Law for All.

Iran Regime Referred To International Criminal Court