Alex McCrory ✒ I'm watching a documentary made in 1983 about the Diplock Court system and the administration of British justice in the north of Ireland.
It is interesting for it's background information, touching as it does on the removal jury trials; changes in the law to allow the courts to admit self-incriminating statements obtained under interrogation, and the use of supergrasses.
One statistic jumped out at me that relates to many discussions that appear online that are critical of positions adapted in the courts by political prisoners today. It has always been my belief these exchanges lack historical context.
The documentary in order to make a point looked at every single case that went before the Diplock courts in the period of the first three months of 1981.
Of all the people involved 170:
147 pleaded guilty.
23 pleased not guilty.
8 were acquited.
Only 1 refused to recognise the court.
This is evidence of a sea change in the attitude of Republican prisoners going before the Diplock courts. This trend would continue throughout the Eighties and into the Nineties.
I will allow the reader to draw their own conclusions from the data.
One statistic jumped out at me that relates to many discussions that appear online that are critical of positions adapted in the courts by political prisoners today. It has always been my belief these exchanges lack historical context.
The documentary in order to make a point looked at every single case that went before the Diplock courts in the period of the first three months of 1981.
Of all the people involved 170:
147 pleaded guilty.
23 pleased not guilty.
8 were acquited.
Only 1 refused to recognise the court.
This is evidence of a sea change in the attitude of Republican prisoners going before the Diplock courts. This trend would continue throughout the Eighties and into the Nineties.
I will allow the reader to draw their own conclusions from the data.