Showing posts with label Danny Morrison. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Danny Morrison. Show all posts
Dixie Elliot ✍ I recently became aware of a video which was posted on YouTube during the week by Sinn Fein titled, ‘Hunger Striker Sean McKenna remembered by his comrade Danny Morrison.’ 


Danny Morrison, Sinn Fein’s Director of Revisionism, walked among the graves of the Republican dead in Milltown Cemetery and once again lied in regards to the ending of the first hunger strike back in December 1980, laying the blame for it’s failure on Brendan Hughes.

If that was sickening enough, seeing him using the name of the late Sean McKenna to sell this lie added to my anger. The grave robbers Burke and Hare had more respect for the dead.

According to Morrison:

. . . The following night the British government were due, through an emissary, to deliver a document to the hunger strikers. Before the document arrived, the hunger strike was called off by Brendan Hughes. The document arrived and Bobby Sands was sent for. All the promises of a progressive prison liberal regime were now, that the British government knew that the hunger strike was over and all those people who said they would intervene and support the prisoners and would support reforms, they all disappeared . . . 

The thing about the truth is that you cannot get caught out telling it, something Morrison can’t seem to get his head around as he’s a habitual liar and the above statement is full of holes, big holes.

I stated many times, given my huge respect for Brendan Hughes, a leader who always led from the front, that any attempt to smear his name regarding how that hunger strike came to an end would be met with the truth and the only ones to blame for this are the liars like Morrison.

However, the one very important person who exposes Morrison’s lie regarding how that hunger strike ended was Bobby Sands himself. I will get to that soon.

Take for example Morrison’s claim, ‘the document arrived and Bobby Sands was sent for…’

No thought whatsoever has gone into that particular lie. Father Meagher received the document at Belfast airport from ‘The Mountain Climber.’  He then took it to Adams and others who were waiting in Clonard Monastery. As they were looking over it Tom Hartley entered the room and told them that the hunger strike was over.

The document contained nothing, it merely indicated that prisoners could wear ‘civilian-type’ clothing during the working week. That was another form of prison uniform.

Bobby had been sent for when the hunger strike ended and he had no document because it was still in the hands of Gerry Adams in Clonard Monastery. The source for this is Adams himself in his book, A Farther Shore.

Why would Bobby return to our wing that night and tell desperate men in Irish that, “ní fhuaireamar feic.” (we got nothing) if there was even the slightest of chances that some British offer gave us some hope of ending the blanket protest? Why did Bobby then sit down on his mattress and start writing a comm to Gerry Adams informing him that he would be leading another hunger strike which would begin on January 1st instead of waiting to see if the Brits kept to their promises? Because they had made none. That hunger strike ended because, as Sean McKenna was nearing death, some men told Brendan they were coming of it, leaving The Dark with no other choice but to end it before Sean died needlessly.

In fact, Bobby told Adams exactly that in the comm he was writing to him. (see screenshots taken from page 305, Chapter 21; Nothing But An Unfinished Song, below).

. . . I don’t believe we can achieve our our aims or recoup our losses in the light of what has occurred. Sooner, rather than later, our defeat will be exposed. When I say, in the light of what has occurred, I mean not only the boys breaking but perhaps our desperate attempts to salvage something . . . 

Adams, Morrison and the others knew how it ended from the time they read that comm from Bobby, yet they persist in the lie that Brendan Hughes had ended it and was therefore responsible for the second hunger strike which claimed the lives of ten brave men. They do this because The Dark died with his principles intact and he never betrayed his dead comrades for political or financial gain and he didn’t hold back, while he lived, in telling the truth.

Given that he also knew the truth, yet was only too willing to promote this lie at his master’s behest, I have no problem in naming Raymond McCartney as being one of those men who told Brendan they were coming off that hunger strike.

Near the end of the video Morrison tells anyone foolish enough to believe him that Bobby’s election victory paved the way for Sinn Féin’s move towards electoral politics. He would have you believe that the hunger strikes were part of a long term strategy to bring Sinn Féin into government in the Stormont it was determined to ‘smash’ back then, and to take their seats with the Free Staters, who had sided with the British against their own people in the North.

According to Morrison:

…The election of Bobby Sands, on the 9th April 1981, provided the springboard for Sinn Féin to adopt it’s electoral strategy, the fruits of which we see today… 

Bobby only stood in that election in the hope that victory would mean that Thatcher couldn’t possibly let a sitting MP die on hunger strike. This of course proved not to be the case, as she was a vindicative evil bitch.

However, even while the hunger strike was still ongoing, Adams and his inner-circle, which of course included Morrison, began to furtively lay the path which would take an unwitting Republican Movement onto the road of electoral politics. Three days after the death of Michael Devine, on the same day that Owen Carron won the bye-election for Bobby’s vacant seat in Fermanagh/South Tyrone, Sinn Féin announced that in future it would contest all ‘Northern Ireland’ elections. 

The hunger strike was still ongoing and this decision had not been to put to the Movement as a whole because that year’s Ard Fheis would not be until late October. Michael Devine had barely been lowered into his grave as they ‘seized the opportunity’ to set their ‘electoral strategy’ in motion. It comes as no surprise that it was Morrison who would ask the delegates at that Ard Fheis if anyone there would object if they took power in Ireland with a ballot paper in one hand and the Armalite in the other.

We all know what eventually happened to the Armalite. They decommissioned it, as did they the right to call themselves Republicans by attending the coronation of the British king, Charles.

Thanks to the family of Bobby Sands, who had only recently found out themselves by uncovering one of his prison comms in the National Archives, we now know he had requested that he be buried in Ballina beside Frank Stagg and Michael Gaughan, because he didn’t like Milltown Cemetery. Bobby also requested that he ‘wanted wrapped in a blanket cause I don’t want humiliated in a stinkin’ suit or shroud.’

Danny Morrison tried to claim that Bobby had later changed his mind about Ballina by coming up with a few lines which he claimed were contained in a comm from Bobby, but the comm he referred to did not in fact include those lines in both the books it was included in, Ten Men Dead and Nothing But An Unfinished Song.

What he could not lie about was that Bobby’s simple request, that he be wrapped in a blanket because he didn’t want humiliated in a stinkin’ suit or shroud, was denied him. Bobby Sands was highly intelligent and he would have fully realised that the screws would not have handed over a prison blanket for him to be laid to rest in. He was obviously referring to a similar type of blanket which would be symbolic of the protest which took up the final years of his life.

Bobby Sands was buried in a shroud and his family weren’t made aware of his final request.

Excerpt from Bury Me In My Blanket by Bobby Sands:

I've thought about that too,” I said, “and it's hard to say to oneself that one is prepared to go to such an extreme, but then we are special prisoners and we are struggling for a special cause, so if I should die here, tell “Mr Mason” to bury me in my blanket . . . ” 

 

Thomas Dixie Elliot is a Derry artist and a former H Block Blanketman.
Follow Dixie Elliot on Twitter @IsMise_Dixie

More Lies Morrison

Anthony McIntyre ☠ It has been an uncomfortable week for former members of the IRA’s Internal Security Unit, both those who worked for the British and those who didn’t. 

Such is the feeding frenzy that anything in the water looking remotely like one of the headhunters is regarded as food to be dissected and devoured, their own heads hunted.

Last week in the space of a few days, allegations emerged against two people reported in the media as having previously plied their counterintelligence trade in the ISU. One, Paddy Monaghan, is deceased. The allegations against him appeared in Sunday Life which claimed he had been outed. Yet the content of the article does not substantiate the outing. It was a string of suspicions expressed by people who either were, or claimed to be, former colleagues of Monaghan. Oddly, there was nobody from the British intelligence services cited in support of the supposed outing.

The other was said by the Irish News to have fled his home in West Belfast. This was later disputed by the man’s solicitor. The journalist Allison Morris also reported that he had been seen drinking with friends in West Belfast.

Unfortunately for the person alleged to have upped sticks, Danny Morrison weighed in to cast doubt on the claims made in the Irish News, accusing the paper of inventing the story. To the man at the centre of the allegations this was as helpful as the kiss of death, immediately giving rise to a surge of suspicion in the already active whisper world. Morrison had previously covered up for Scappaticci’s role in the British state’s Dirty War when he was first outed so, to many, it prompted the thought of here we go again, same old, same old.

The accused man, by now, must be sitting in his abode terrified in case Adam O’Toole of An Phoblacht wades in to back him. O’Toole’s cover-up for Scappaticci was described by the journalist Suzanne Breen as holding “pride of place in all the tripe trundled out … it’s unbelievable that anybody took the garbage it printed seriously.”

Morrison and his ilk, because they were “willing participants” in Britain’s dirty war, using their influence to deflect people away from what it actually was, have diminished the likelihood of a queue forming this time around to buy anything that even smells like cover-up. Their dissembling has fueled an equal and opposite reaction whereby people will be inclined to believe the opposite of whatever Danny Morrison tells them. 

Moreover, we might wonder why Morrison would challenge the Irish News story no matter how correct he might have been in his assertions that the 'well known West Belfast republican' had not fled his home.  He had to know that his contribution, given his role in the Scappaticci cover-up, rather than exonerate the individual in the eye of the storm, would have made him a person of interest to many observers. 

Ahead of the Kenova Report being published the rumour mill will be indulging in foreplay in anticipation of the climax many either expect or hope for. There will be no shortage of people willing to believe anything so long as it is whispered to them. For that very reason, in the interest of fairness and accuracy, the bar should be high. Sinn Fein lowered it considerably by its cover-up for Scappaticci, making it easy for critics to hurl accusations around, and difficult for the accused to defend against particularly if Danny Morrison is in their corner.

Those culpable of working for the British in their Dirty War have no right to see their role buried along with their victims. Whether through choice or coercion, their decision was heinous. Those not working for the British, no matter how much of the Sinn Fein Kool-Aid they have either doled out or consumed, have every right not to be wrongly accused.

If there is a substantive belief that certain people were agents of the British, then the allegation should only ever be openly levelled because it is rooted in an authentic perspective and grounded in evidence. It is not a charge to be contrived merely to smear an opponent.

Follow on Twitter @AnthonyMcIntyre.

World Of Whispers

Anthony McIntyre thinks Danny Morrison is a veteran errorist and wonders what lies behind his latest demonstration of being wrong.

A Wrong Man Calls It Wrong ... Again

He had such a stunning overview of the organisation that a whole British intelligence unit was devoted to handling him. His output was so prolific that two handlers and four collators worked full-time on his leads. His source reports were read by ministers. Army careers were built on his informationLiam Clarke 

A Lethal Ally

  • Monkeys are superior to men in this: when a monkey looks into a mirror, he sees a monkey - Malcolm De Chazal
Danny Morrison seems to have left the shelter of the monastery, freed for a while from his vow of silence. A relapse or full recovery - we don’t yet know - from the effects of at least two embarrassing encounters that showed the measure of the man. There was little to measure.

Morrison Is No Monkey

Guest writer Gerry O'Halloran is asking questions of Danny Morrison about double standards.  
Danny Morrison is on the campaign trail.
 


What's the Difference Danny?

Broadly speaking, the information which I now have, I am absolutely satisfied with, is that in blunt terms that Richard O’Rawe, on the key issue between himself and Danny Morrison and the others, that Richard O’Rawe was right and that those who were arguing against him were wrong … I can confirm that it happened, that the prisoners’ acceptance of the deal was over-ruled by the outside leadership …  I have also spoken to the ‘Mountain Climber’; … of course, he didn’t know what was going on inside the prison, but the things that he did know and which he’s told me, confirm Richard O’Rawe’s account – Eamonn McCann (see also: Eamon McCann – “Richard isn’t a liar. He told the truth in his book.” (2008))

Danny Morrison helping the hunger strikers

Death By Deception

On LMFM Monday past Danny Morrison stated that he did not take a British offer to settle the 1981 hunger strike into the H Blocks on the 5th of July 1981. Morrison has long labeled Richard O’Rawe dishonest for having claimed otherwise. Yet Morrison has been proven wrong so many times that people are no longer sure if The Wrong Man is a title of Morrison’s 1997 novel or the name of the author. He has changed his story more times than his boxers.

Morrison smeared O’Rawe, claiming his narrative was scurrilous and that his book Blanketmen was contrived 'on Another Man's Hunger Strike.' Morrison was lying then, he is lying now. The following transcript and video show intermediary Brendan Duddy/The Mountain Climber making it crystal clear that he secured clearance from the British government for Morrison to go into the prison on 5 July 1981 with an offer. Just as O’Rawe said. Maybe Duddy too was out to wreck the peace process despite having spent half his life trying to build it.

What Morrison once said to Richard O’Rawe during one of his many smears can again be turned back on him: Let this be the end of it. It will be no other way. Ten out of every nine people simply don’t believe Morrison.

Morrison With Hand On Heart Swears No British Offer to End Hunger Strike.

The Michael Reade Show

LMFM Radio 95.8FM Drogheda

31 March 2014

DOWNLOAD (right-click & "save target as")

Michael Reade (MR) interviews former Sinn Féin publicity director Danny Morrison (DM) as a rebuttal to the interview Michael conducted last week with Dr. Anthony McIntyre, the lead researcher for The Belfast Project, about Gerry Adams' comments on the Boston College tapes.

Thanks as always to the TPQ transcriber.

(begins time stamp 15:20)

Morrison With Hand on Heart Responds to McIntyre

Warren Buffet's comment on the relationship between sea level and visible nudity is an apt one for Boston College. Now that the tide of deceit has gone out the College narrative in respect of the Belfast Project stands pretty much naked: one high, dry lie which College spokesman Jack Dunn tries vainly to breathe life into. Putting a smile on the face of a corpse is pretty much what Jack does these days for a living. Hardly something that would encourage the average punter to have faith in his friendship.

For all of its conflict resolution posturing over the years  Boston College today stands knowing, although hardly admitting, that its irresponsible handling of the Belfast Project from its inception, as outlined in the Chronicle for Higher Education, has fueled the type of controversy that conflict feeds on. Much of the brouhaha bubbling around Haass, for example, draws on the type of knowledge that BC falsely promised it could keep safe from the type of people who want to use it for purposes of conflictual recrimination rather than peaceful reconciliation.

Brandishing the arrogance seemingly afforded by wealth, college staff attired in their sable fur coats were able to block out the cold house political temperature of the North. It was probably on the basis of such aggressive indifference that they felt they could risk hoaxing their way through legal protocol and set up the Belfast Project. A we are Big Boston and nobody in begging bowl Belfast will dare challenge us' type thing.’ And if they do we will mobilize our law faculty, which was monumentally ignorant of the existence of MLAT, to deal with them. Bravo Big Boston.

Dunn and Dusted

I'm fascinated by the whole concept of snake handling. When you read about the Pentecostal snake handlers, what strikes you the most is their commitment
- Lucinda Williams


Snakeknife

  • What you end up remembering isn't always the same as what you have witnessed ― Julian Barnes.

Somebody emailed me a Twitter comment from Danny Morrison yesterday in which he reportedly said ‘in the old days republicans never pleaded guilty before Brits - apart from some, now very vocal, leading republican dissidents.’

Morrison appears to have made his comment in response to the court appearance of a Derry republican who pleaded guilty in return for a three year sentence, something 'never' contemplated by any republican contemporary of Morrison. ‘Never’ is one of those absolutist statements which leave virtually no room for exception. For that reason it is easily falsifiable.

Whether this is memory lapse or conscious revisionism on the part of Morrison, the reader is free to make up their own minds. Given the tone it looks less like bringing clarity and more a case of the usual smear thrown the way of yet another who has refused to buy the bull. Whatever about court strategy back then, smearing certainly went on in the old days too.

In the old days ...