Showing posts with label Éire Nua. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Éire Nua. Show all posts
Pádraig O Maonaigh ✍ What if Éire Nua, or a variation styled upon it, was implemented today even if only initially within the 26 counties? 

What impact would such a democratic initiative play?

The impact of effectively democratizing the country would inevitably place the needs of the people on top of the agenda which would be set by the people. Here is a brief description of the proposed structure of Éire Nua,where we can speculate on how it could serve the people and address some of the high profile issues of today.

Federal National Government (Dail Eireann)

No longer to be viewed as the single house of decision making, this Parliament is the guarantor of the National Constitution, proposed to consist of elected representatives derived from the provincial parliaments and by Free National elections. The work of the federal government is to represent the country and its interests internationally.

Global concerns around health, defense, climate and international peace would be represented by the National Government. Ireland's position as a neutral nation is vital to the common good between nations. Ireland, as mandated, should be an active voice for meditation on conflicts which de-stabilize nations and cause people to flee from violence and poverty.

Provincial Government

This decentralized local government is essential to delivering for the people within its boundaries with reference to the unique needs of its own demographic identity. In terms of economic development this construct will work exclusively on the needs of its population and eradicate the economic inequality expressed by those “beyond the Red Cow” in rural and remote parts of the country.

The social and economic legislation for the region can be constructed by the people in the region. Taxation to develop the province is collected and fairly re-distributed in proportion back into the province.

Regional Boards

These Boards will again be elected positions derived from the district councils supplemented by expert professionals to locally govern in the areas of economic growth and Healthcare and to develop cultural activities in a modern and inclusive Ireland free from sectarianism, racism, homophobia or any other form of discrimination.

District Councils

These will be locally elected positions and will deal with the substantive issues facing people. The decisions made by the government will be made directly by people in the locality, accountable to the people in the locality. The areas of governance that affect day to day life such as law and order, education, employment, local planning, environmental protections, agriculture, small industry, social welfare and social services all involving expert professionals seeking best practice in delivery and ethics accountable to the people at district council level.

Community Councils

These are voluntary councils and bodies representing community level democracy. These councils ensure that all minorities are represented and voices are heard, concerns dealt with collectively at community level. These are vital constructs which can give the locality an input into their own environment.

Issues

The National Question

The National question is dealt with as one of the priorities of Éire Nua,. It seeks the return of the Ulster province to its historical 9 county context. It seeks to implement local democracy, preventing domination of one cultural identity over another. An end to forced reluctant sectarian power sharing would advance natural and overdue reconciliation as time moves forward where the secularity of society and full separation of all churches and state is a reality.

The Health Emergency

For decades now the Irish people have despaired of the health service in the country. It's been run down in favor of increasing the private sector alternative despite ample investment. This is a basic provision of a population and it's been commoditized. Services should be free for all at the point of service provided through general taxation.

Oversight at Regional level by elected representatives from district councils would be mandated to ensure the highest priority and efficiency is delivered for citizens.

The national parliament would be mandated by the regional boards to send delegates to pharmaceutical manufacturers to secure contracts for medicines at the best rates and to establish best practice at WHO level overseen by national experts and national representatives finally accountable to the Irish people.

If we democratize this sector we will oversee it and remove the profiteering middleman. Situations where Irish citizens have to travel abroad for treatment would not occur in a fully developed system focused on care. This area would be a tangible measure of success for the nation.

The Irish Economy

The Authors of Éire Nua developed a social and economic program called Saol Nua which envisages a program of economic development which does not limit the right to private enterprise beyond the common good, and encourages workers co-operatives and national industry. This article does not seek to address this in-depth but does recognize the progressive spirit of it in its social justice merits.

The Irish economy is presently wide open to global financial volatility as it is a free market economy that is an example of the ills of Neo-liberal profiteering and limits government intervention, even beyond times of crisis. There is no conceivable way that this is consistent with the wishes of the people.

A national economy serves the needs of the nation in terms of infrastructure and services. The local economy serves the needs of each citizen in providing employment and services locally. Nowhere are the needs of capitalist profit making companies considered as a structural component of the economic system.

This should not exclude the rights to private enterprise which will create sustainable employment and foster creativity. If people had access to democracy they would cast their say on how the economy is constructed.

It is likely that a Scandinavian style social democracy could be the preferred result where taxation provides for the health, social and security needs of its people while allowing for a regulated trade and enterprise market.

This, if indeed preferred, would be neither an entirely socialist or capitalist construct but fundamentally it is the people who will decide its form. The integral role charities play in Ireland in servicing financial inequality should not be necessary if the economy is built to serve the people.

The Housing Emergency

Generations of Irish people cannot afford their own home. Mortgages in Ireland are multiplied many times in expense when compared with some of the economic powerhouses of Central Europe.

Homeowners have been left stranded in pyrite and mica destroyed buildings fighting for compensation due to a poor regulatory system. 11,500 people are officially homeless, not counting hidden homelessness. International finance vulture funds have managed to take control of properties once owned by bailed out banks, which were then bailed out by the people with no tangible return only vulnerable tenancies.

Few citizens may be aware of the AHB schemes to provide social housing, where up to 90% of the property value is provided by the state, through general taxation, even though the deeds of the property transfer to the private "Approved housing body or company" after a defined period of 30 years. Why not just create State owned units owned by the people?

There is no question that national territory could be sold to private enterprise, foreign or domestic, as in the case of Coillte where an outrage is being conducted presently, as a private British company has been allowed to buy up territory bigger than Dublin for forestation from the State.

If the Irish people could manage the mandate over its elected representatives surely these crimes would be fiction. The cascade of democratic institutions under Éire Nua would make corruption and profiteering around property apparent quickly and thus prevent it.

The Irish people in all its diversity have a right to a home. This would be enshrined within the Constitution. Universal social housing would be made available, owned by the State and accessible to people as per their means or lack of.

The era of private landlords servicing social housing for profit would end. Vulture funds could be dispossessed and people could be homed immediately. Nationalized banks and credit unions should support the needs of the people. Those seeking to own private property should be free to do so by their own means at reasonable rates.

The Energy Emergency

In a democratized Ireland the people would play their part in preserving the natural beauty of the country, its land, seas and rivers. Climate objectives for Ireland must be just, fair and proportional. Green dictates that have effectively made Ireland no longer fuel and energy-sufficient must be examined by genuine mandated representatives of the people.

Renewable energy should be promoted as a sustainable and environmentally friendly form of power. Until such time that this technology meets the peoples needs we must ask why peat and coal is outlawed and national gas and oil resources are not being harvested for the Irish people. Interconnects with other states see fossil fuel created electricity imported while similar sources are shut down here. Local democratic decision making would scrutinize such inconsistencies.

National wealth producing resources like oil and gas and other minerals have been basically stolen and sold for little return and for massive private gain. All these wealth producing resources must be nationalized and wealth produced invested in the lives of the Irish people.

Irish Neutrality

As we have recently come to learn, the principle of Irish Neutrality isn't a constitutionally protected principle only in spirit. We are not signatories to the Hague Convention and we are engaged in various military activities with NATO and PESCO. Despite the fact that the Irish people clearly hold dear this element of our national identity.

A people's referendum is required to put this issue to the people and remove the ambiguity being exalted by servile career politicians who are long removed from identifying as representatives.

Agriculture and Tourism

Agriculture is, along with Tourism, one of Ireland's greatest sources of revenue. Both are highly identifiable national successes and pillars of our economy.

There are currently climate targets suggesting enforcement of radical change in agriculture that urgently require democratic oversight in Ireland. Such global dictates are a breach of sovereignty.

Ireland's hospitality industry has contracted greatly in recent times due to Covid and is becoming unsustainable due to costs. Tourism depends on a vibrant culture and hospitality sector and provisions must be made for their protection. The tourist industry is also under pressure as much capacity is being used for housing people made homeless in Ireland or coming into the country as refugees or asylum seekers.

Fisheries

Irish territories expand far more at sea than on land. Ireland has been badly sold out by a string of governments, and Irish fishermen are restricted greatly in what they can yield in favor of major EU powers. Sadly the EU are policing one of our greatest resources. This is a complete violation of sovereignty and an area where we must re-assert our National rights. If the Irish people fully understood the resources available it would not take long for a groundswell of support to demand change in this area.

Immigration And Social Cohesion

Directly related to all other services such as health, housing and education the ability to absorb demand on the system is an everyday reality that must be answered totally independent from ideology on the issue.

Would the Irish people have mandated the department of foreign affairs to sign the UN Migration compact in 2018 or sanction subscription to international obligations to the EU on immigration based on the health of public services? These questions cannot be answered because they were not asked.

The UN migration compact itself highlights challenges to be overcome where "overwhelming social infrastructures with the unexpected arrival of large numbers of people" is identified.

Embracing democracy is to listen to the people. Is there a risk that they would object? There is that risk, but to ignore it is anti-democratic and foments social unrest.

Ireland has a strong history of generosity and humanitarianism. Ireland's history cannot ignore how Irish people starved to death or immigrated in their millions in the 1800s. There is no reason to believe that our provisions for others including hosting asylum seekers and refugees would be found wanting. Leadership in the country should always encourage welcoming generosity.

Equal distribution of centers across Ireland would be decided by local government. Ireland in a vibrant democracy would be a more equal society. If the Irish people ruled, then the Irish Nation would be able to scale up in accommodation, health and education provisions. Ireland is capable of providing food for populations far greater than our own.

Our biggest issue in recent times has been increasing demand on collapsing public systems coupled with divisive discriminatory rhetoric from the extreme right. If community and district councils represented the people in the community as they should in a democracy there would be no protests on the streets simply because the people would decide on local planning regulations.

Some regions may have a majority more liberal and sympathetic to immigration than others but the outworking of local plebiscites would decide on policy, and social cohesion could be more easily achieved. National policy would be democratically constructed.

Media In A Democracy

Media is fundamentally important in a democracy. When media is privately owned and funded it is not free. State laws should reflect this and such is envisaged within Éire Nua. In an age where misinformation and disinformation creates such societal impact a source of truth overseen by the people is essential to hold all sectors to account.

Conclusion

In concluding this article and analysis and opinion of Éire Nua in terms of today, the essence of it in how it seeks to implement a true participatory democracy would be to radically overhaul the systems of government across the Island. Its authors always sought to develop it further and it still represents today the best and most comprehensive alternative to the failed systems in place and give ownership of Ireland to all the people of Ireland.

Pádraig O Maonaigh is a social justice activist.

Éire Nua For Modern Times III

Pádraig O Maonaigh ✍ The chief architects of Eire Nua were men of the highest Republican credentials who recognized that Irish Independence alone would not fully achieve republican objectives. 

Partition has never been the only problem. The 26 county state also stands opposed to The Republic and what the spirit of The Republic means to the lives of the Irish people.

The authors sought the creation of completely new governmental structures with a rights based constitution to deliver a “New Ireland”, controlled by the Irish people alone. A true democracy, which eradicates the crony neocolonial, clientelist system in place since 1922, and ending the ongoing British presence in Ireland. This vision included the active participation of all traditions in the democratic institutions of Ireland.

Since the 1970s, the 26 county State has continually traded National sovereignty to Imperialist (EU) and Globalist/Capitalist constructs at the long term expense of the Irish people, while the six county state has become re-normalized as a continuing colony within the British State. Eire Nua identified these trends and sought to address them. National wealth creating resources have been continually sold off to private interests while developmental grants from the EU were used as incentives towards integration, manifesting, in repayment terms, with eroding National sovereignty.

Today in the 26 counties it seems that there are no areas of incompetence, or corruption, capable of toppling a government within its term. Record homelessness and unprecedented health crises are only two examples of consistently shocking governance that reflect the lack of a functioning democracy as they are clearly not results of the people's will, and due to longevity of crisis cannot be explained away as anything other than, at best, the indirect result of neoliberal policy.

Without a petition to recall those elected, the five year term allows governments in Leinster House to invariably readjust their agendas after assuming power, safe in the knowledge that they only need to appease their junior coalition partners to remain in office. If this is not by design. it is a reoccurring coincidence that the electioneering promises are abandoned.

Perpetuation of this position of privilege is an obvious motivation for the continued suppression of genuine participatory democracy. The system works for those who profit. It also works for the neoliberal powerhouses located in London, Brussels, Washington and other influential think tanks who gather annually in Davos and who, alongside global corporations and bodies, hold huge influence over significant economic and strategic policies in Dublin with scant reference to the people or their democratic will.

Examples of these economic and strategic policies are: the bank guarantee scheme which repaid those responsible for the Irish banking crisis of 2008/2009 - which was caused by International Finance speculators and the Irish State joining PESCO, the prelude to a European army in spite of the popularity of Irish Neutrality. These massive issues should be mandated by referendum if we truly claim to believe in democracy.

Centralizing power can lead to the erosion of democracy very quickly as occurred disastrously over the last century, where consolidation of power both communist and fascist reached its ceiling resulting in dictatorships and millions of deaths. The world over, democracy is thrown around as the absolute, to safeguard against the rise of totalitarian power. Éire Nua is focused on democratizing and decentralizing power back into the communities, the essence of democracy, so who should fear it? Perhaps those who are benefiting from the current increasingly centralized system. Centralization realistically prevents broad participation in government. When unelected bureaucrats or Corporate directors have more power than the people we are not living in a genuine democracy.

If one needs proof of the anti-democratic and neo-colonial intentions of a centralized federal EU, just consider the views of Guy Verhofstadt, ex-prime minister of Belgium and former leader of the Liberal group in the European Parliament, who, in an interview with journalist Michał Matlak in October 2019 when discussing Brexit and Sovereignty revealed his thoughts:

Matlak: Are member states ready to renounce their sovereignty?

Verhofstadt: Well, their sovereignty doesn’t exist in a globalized world. Sovereignty means that you can decide your own path. European states on their own are not able to do that. There’s only European sovereignty, if any.

This is an example of views where a European superstate is envisaged. And it's clear from comments from the EU commission president Ursula Von der Leyen that it is a strategic goal of the EU to supplement this superstate with a European army which collaborates in synchronicity with NATO.

Ireland today is deeply ingrained within this EU construct by the consent of Irish politicians but what about the consent of the people? Lisbon and Nice were rejected before being run a second time quite undemocratically. If an unbiased and fully informed referendum were held on the implications to sovereignty what would be the outcome?

What we should avoid is a Brexit style reassessment of the EU on divisive lines. Ireland must re-assert its sovereignty and Independence and reform its role in the EU as guided by the Irish people if the EU is to be compatible with Irish Sovereignty.

It's been slow incremental change that's relinquished Free State National Sovereignty. It is certainly a deliberate political direction if remarks around "backward sovereignty" by Fianna Fáil Leader Mícheál Martin are to be understood. Sovereignty and Liberty should not be traded for membership of any external construct as it is not for any one generation to trade. This by no means limits the natural inclination of the Irish people to participate in a vibrant, collective, international community which respects national boundaries and sovereignty as equals in search of common goals. Indeed it's in our best interests. Éire Nua recognized the supreme authority of the Irish people to govern Ireland and without contradiction be internationalist.

The fact that the present custodians of Éire Nua stand permanently and honorably opposed to entering the partitionist system means the potential of Éire Nua is effectively locked away until a revolution has been achieved. Today there is no realistic prospect of revolution such is the extent of State technological apparatus nor are there political conditions conducive to it becoming popular.

The final part of this article will speculate what dynamic participatory democracy could bring to bear on the big issues in the news today in Ireland.

Pádraig O Maonaigh is a social justice activist.

Éire Nua For Modern Times Ⅱ

Pádraig O Maonaigh ✍ Ireland is ever-changing and has changed much since 1971 when Éire Nua, was adopted as Irish Republican policy for a postcolonial Ireland.

When first read in the context of Ireland in 1971, when a long guerilla war was only in its early years and when Republican military objectives were arguably at their highest chance of success, the reader's priority is drawn to how the 6 county position is to be resolved within the policy.

This focus point of course is natural given the conflict at that time and as the 26-county state was presenting a facade to the world that it was a functioning democracy.

Since being first developed, I think significantly, by Republicans from outside the six counties, and adopted as Republican policy, nothing has come close to resetting the parameters of what is in my view a deeply unequal and corrupt, anti-democratic constitutional arrangement of two states in Ireland. To get right to the point, the greatest benefit of the Éire Nua, proposal is that it vests power back in the people where it belongs.

Understandably, with hindsight, many Nationalists and Republicans within the six counties may have struggled at that time to see how liberating it would be to share a provincial parliament, in opposition benches, with a continuing majority of Unionists given the very oppression that the Unionist administration of the Orange State visited on them. This oppression was the very reason for the civil rights movement and the subsequent suppression of the most modest demands for rights and equality arguably becoming the stimulus for recruitment and a renewed militant Republican liberation Campaign.

If the general will of the Nationalist population before the late 1960s had been in favor of National liberation as the primary focus and not simply everyday equality then the initiative of Operation Harvest would have yielded more popular support and success. The fact that it didn't led to the practical final cessation of military operations of the "Old" IRA and the embarking on a socialist program for democratic change.

With the absence of an organized militant republican force, this gave rise to the need for the birth of the Provisionals, as the Orange State attempted to crush the civil rights campaign and loyalists violently attacked the Catholic and Nationalist population resulting in the pogroms and people fleeing areas of the North. This situation later evolved and saw the Provisionals going from community defense to Crown Force attack in the following years in a war against Britain for a 32 county Socialist Republic.

In 2023, however, we have a different situation in the six counties. There is a popular, non-Republican-dispensation among the electorate for a functioning parliament with both communities represented as indicated by the support expressed in 1998. Indeed, there is a growing third demographic that identifies as neither tradition now. All seek a functioning democracy which has proven to be impossible to consistently deliver through Stormont, firstly because subordination to Westminster makes a mockery of the democratic principle but secondly because the sectarian headcount remains the perpetual mechanism of representation.

With demographic trends continuing to see the Nationalist cohort reach parity and beyond there is an increasing likelihood of an eventual border poll, the very un-republican resolution contained within the Good Friday Agreement. Without detailing the restrictions of the border poll and its own anti-democratic dimension it still represents the only likely mechanism for the next constitutional change, which is coming.

There is, therefore, theoretically, no reason why a 9 county Dail Uladh would be such a radical concept. The maximum devolution of power to the lowest possible community level envisaged in Éire Nua, would see autonomously controlled communities. This would mitigate the concerns of domination of one tradition over another which is what the orange state visited on Nationalists. This would give each citizen access to influence their locality at council level and allow freedom of each diverse unique cultural or ethnic identity.

We have learned in the imperfect peace years since 1998 that community cooperation happens naturally as trust is built over time. In this scenario, as the constitutional issue will have been resolved, the access to true democratic local power will provide the kind of fairness and local cooperation impossible if ruled by Dublin, London or Brussels.

It is crucial therefore, that no future constitutional tie to Britain be inserted into the resolution of a border poll in favor of Irish Unity that would hinder the new beginning between people. True democracy at local level makes Sovereign Jurisdiction an irrelevance in the substantive local issues but continuation of colonial claims prolongs the divide.

If the cascade of democratic structure envisaged in Éire Nua was not implemented in the event of Unity, then, as Connolly would have pointed out, it would still be only flags and accents changing: the committees for the rich are still in charge. This is why we must go further and truly democratize society on an all Ireland basis. With such democratic access, economic justice can be decided on by the people which will surely remove the profiteers and vultures consuming the working class people.

What about the old "Free State" territory?

The radical democratization of the other three provinces is crucial to disestablishing the Neo-liberal stranglehold of EU Federalism and US Corporate control over the potential of the country.

I will speculate that this is possibly the strategic reason why external interests would have wanted Éire Nua, dumped as the policy of the Provisional Republican movement, using the sop to Unionism as an easy way out. While acknowledging that division within Ulster was deep. Ireland of today couldn't provide the strategic military logistics for the US war machine that it does in a truly democratic society because quite simply the majority don't want them here.

When O Bradaigh and O Connell were ousted effectively from leadership roles in the movement, Éire Nua, went with them, and the revolutionary vision left with the revolutionary leaders just like in 1922. Without a fundamental change to where power lies in relation to the people, there is little material benefit to the everyday lives of people in Ireland. We must also remember that the current system works well for a privileged section of the people and they would not like to see such democracy at work. These are the same class of people who existed just as well inside the British System too.

True Democracy must be egalitarian, pluralist and secular to ensure liberty, equality and justice. This must also include recognition of fundamental civil and human rights and directly involve the people in participatory local, national and international structures.

Democratization and Sovereignty are proportional, but this does not mean isolation internationally. The will of the majority of Irish people, clearly, is Internationalist, which means we must maintain our place as a progressive nation while reforming the EU to resemble true democratic cooperation.

The Éire Nua policy suffers from stigma simply because it was written by Republicans. It isn't widely discussed outside of Republican interest groups and for the many who do not share in the understanding of the Republican ideals, which have been slandered and misrepresented, first by the British and then by the counter-revolutionary West British and latterly West European Leinster House Establishment who do not see what Pearse defined freedom as, “Separation and Sovereignty”.

I believe Éire Nua has to be viewed outside of the Republican package as a democratic alternative to what exists. For the people at large to understand the practical participatory principles of Éire Nua, without bias it may need to be presented in isolation from being the policy of any group or at least free from ideological baggage.

As the original authors and more recent revisions of the policy have always insisted, the policy is open to debate and development. Continuing membership of the EU is likely preferred by the people for example. This means the EU must be reformed, as Sovereignty cannot be both in Brussels and with the people. We must always consider landscape changes to social and economic events but the fundamental concepts of Éire Nua are ultimately the essence of democracy, Independence and equality for Ireland.

In part two I will give an opinion on how maximum devolution of power as envisaged in Éire Nua would affect some of the big issues of today in Irish society.

 ⏯Pádraig O Maonaigh is a social justice activist.

Éire Nua For Modern Times Ⅰ

Finnian O Domhnaill  advises unionism to embrace Eire Nua before the opportunity is lost. Finnian O Domhnaill is a political writer from Donegal, currently living in Derry. He is the creator of the political page No Bones About It.

Éire Nua, : Unionism’s Last Hope?

Writing for TPQ on constitutional options for a United Ireland post-Brexit, Sean Bresnahan, Chair of the Thomas Ashe Society Omagh, argues that the Éire Nua initiative for a Federal All-Ireland Republic can best advance a new beginning for all of the Irish people.

Éire Nua: A New Way Forward For Ireland Post-Brexit