tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807238897188927967.post3095449568375877080..comments2024-03-28T04:50:14.406+00:00Comments on TPQ: In Defence Of Jamie – And Others Like HimAMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00559413440743290550noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807238897188927967.post-77549702133596924552015-07-22T21:23:23.017+01:002015-07-22T21:23:23.017+01:00Marty, I broadly agree with you, I havent seen Mc ...Marty, I broadly agree with you, I havent seen Mc Michael put on the spot, but definately Adams segued into inanity to distract the questioner when troubled. Adams himself was/is very handsome too, as was MMG save for a dodgy 90's (Alan Partridge said he looked like a clown without makeup!). <br />Anyway,it seemed Loyalist used to at least have a bit of panache, at the time of writing I DaithiDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03154264514142897745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807238897188927967.post-16885232839939068102015-07-22T12:58:27.873+01:002015-07-22T12:58:27.873+01:00Daithi D beauty a cara is surely in the eye of the...Daithi D beauty a cara is surely in the eye of the beholder, as for Mc Michael being articulate well a cara you could say the same about Adams and we know who writes his scripts, put either of them on the spot and its a different matter,Mc Michael was indeed deadly he had the backing of SB, RUC, FRU, the brits udr etc .loyalism doesnt really have a voice because in reality they have no argument martyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09814904389826171437noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807238897188927967.post-82858119533767857272015-07-22T09:20:12.950+01:002015-07-22T09:20:12.950+01:00Everytime he gets in front of a camera, its a wast...Everytime he gets in front of a camera, its a wasted chance for Loyalists to put their case coherently. As such I would be firmly against any censorship of him from a strategic point of view (if nothing else) . Contrast that with someone like a John McMichael who was deadly because he was handsome, articulate and could lead others, a foe worthy of effort.DaithiDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03154264514142897745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807238897188927967.post-84708168260813992342015-07-21T19:17:31.089+01:002015-07-21T19:17:31.089+01:00Great post.we need to hear from those disaffected ...Great post.we need to hear from those disaffected and marginalised. Not the nicccceee alliance type and fucking castle Catholics who <br />With big house unionists have screwed this country stupid and are still at it the NAMA scandal just the latest examplemartyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09814904389826171437noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807238897188927967.post-49358470532301729252015-07-21T16:57:53.886+01:002015-07-21T16:57:53.886+01:00I like free speech. But Jamie is a highly sensatio...I like free speech. But Jamie is a highly sensationalised character, and he is very well placed as an agitator. Particularly on social media. He has a lot of information to give us, the public. Why? Who gives him the information? Is it really a matter of free speech? Or are we public a free audience of idiots? Drooling over the snippets of chickenfeed the Brits throw out at us, in this remarkablyAmonrosierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02403811621627886616noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4807238897188927967.post-46639692189378086202015-07-21T08:02:03.948+01:002015-07-21T08:02:03.948+01:00I agree that he has a right to speak just as we al...I agree that he has a right to speak just as we all have a right not to listen....Niallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06013400649117430986noreply@blogger.com