Tuesday, May 24, 2016

Tagged under: , ,

Took The Language Of The Easter Rising and Plagiarised It.

James Wilson an occasional consultant with Expac North, with ...


A Response To Plunkett Nugent And His Reflections On 1916.



Let me first preface my remarks with caveat that this is not some Slugger O’Toole style war of words between anonymous bloggers. I have met, shared a meal with, and respect Plunkett Nugent. I have actively listened/read his reflections on 1916. I agree with him that revisionists, in an attempt to denigrate the moral integrity of the Easter insurgents, have tried to create a comparison with the Ulster Protestants of the 36th (Ulster) Division, and the ‘sacrifice’ at the Somme. 

I would however respectfully challenge the assertion that the motivation of the men who ‘went over the top’ on the 1st July 1916, were doing so as ‘mere cannon fodder enticed to their death by a sectarian desire to trump democracy in Ireland’ or to thwart Home Rule. The remarkable military achievement of the Ulstermen on the Somme, and its cult like legacy can be attributed to four factors.

First, they were inspired just as devoutly to the British Crown and Empire as the Irish Republicans were to the aspiration of an Irish Republic. There is no hierarchy of moral national superiority here. Irish Nationalism, as a political ideology had failed miserably to win or engage the hearts and minds of Protestants in the north east of the island. (And there are good lessons to be gleaned in exploring why). The British Empire they claimed to be loyal to had called in the markers, and like the young Australians at Sulva Bay in 1915, or the Newfoundlanders one mile up the line at Beaumont Hamel, these young lions were not going to be found wanting in raw courage.

Secondly, the Ulster Division was unique in the Somme attack in that the men generally disobeyed orders and actually charged the German positions. They won the race against the machine gunners emerging from their dugouts. They captured their main objective, the Schwabben Redoubt and stormed the German second line. Indeed as they approached the German third line they were so far ahead of their schedule they were caught by their own artillery. 

Thirdly, the breakthrough achieved by the Ulsters was sadly not emulated by the rest of the British Army. They held out gallantly against wave after wave of German counter attacks. Ammunition and water ran out, but that Ulster Protestant siege mentality sustained them. The war graves mark where they breached the German lines and the vital ground they defended. They hold it still. 

In the aftermath the sheer devastation of a 5,000 + casualty lists began to filter back to Ulster like a malaise. It was never in my childhood referred to as a ‘blood sacrifice’. However Ulster had simply done her duty by the British Empire, and there were expectations that this Lockean contract would be reciprocated. In the partition that followed, with the creation of Catholic theocracy bereft of social justice, there was a sense that the Unionist stance had been vindicated. In reply to the Green Free State, unionists wittingly created the Orange State.

The men of the 36th Ulster Division came home without ceremony or adoration. Many bore mental scars of PTSD that were simply not appreciated or understood. I recall the matron of a nursing home complaining that one veteran was ‘troublesome because he cried at night and wet the bed’. Geoffrey Beattie argues that many Somme veterans suffered from the depression of Survivor’s Syndrome. 

There was of course a formal and UK/Commonwealth wide 50th commemoration in 1966. Veterans were reviewed by the Queen at Balmoral Showgrounds and some made a pilgrimage back to Thiepval. But in popular culture they were being airbrushed from memory by the sexier heroes of the Battle of Britain, Monty’s Desert Rats and D Day. No comic books or Ealing Studios production illustrated their battles. The scale of the causalities inhibited any triumphalism and many veterans like George Hackney (I do recommend his unique photographic exhibition at Ulster Museum), came to reject war and all forms of militarism.

Finally, When I visited the Somme in July 1986, the Ulster Tower had fallen derelict and the only official ceremony was at the British Somme Memorial. But the long war changed all that. Ulster Protestants needed heroic myths to sustain them. The latter day UVF claimed the Somme as a battle honour, the Orange Order changed pre-Twelfth church services to ‘Somme Parades’. It even commissioned its own ugly memorial to blot the tasteful landscape at the Ulster Tower. Thousands made pilgrimages to Thiepval with politicians scrambling to be in the official photographs. Bemused and bewildered elderly veterans were plucked from obscurity and belatedly made folk heroes . 

Thus, the Somme was changed from a sombre and costly duty, and elevated to the status of heroic blood sacrifice. A sacrifice - unionist politicians reminded us - that needed to be sustained and renewed in the struggle against Irish Republicanism. In doing so they took the language of the Easter Rising and plagiarised it. The two unrelated events were reduced to crude political comparison.

If I have one request to Plunkett and other Republicans it is that we seek a political generosity that respects both the living and the dead amongst our former enemies. To sit down and explore how we shift from presenting conflict (killing each other) as a the contextual issue, and begin to overtly promote a critical respect for the principle that in 21st century Ireland, social justice can be pursued without recourse to violence.

To create together a psychological repertoire that accepts, respects, humanises, and personalises those neighbours who do not share our religious confession, political aspiration or cultural expression. This ability to develop cross sectarian working class solidarities was not possible during the conflict.

4 comments :

jgr33n said...

The problem I have with equivalence here is that the those who fought for the British Empire - fought for an imperialist army that had suppressed and subjugated native peoples across the globe - secondly the First World War had at its heart a series of alliances between imperialist nations including "little Belgium" who as we know left quite the legacy in the Congo and other places. So the reality is that those who fought for these imperial armies did so to try and protect the status quo or indeed to further the imperial aims of their country at the expense of other countries. Thirdly their leaders were aristocrats and privileged buffoons who drank wine in chateaus and casually ordered suicidal charges by their troops while they observed from a far distance in the rear (if they observed at all, seeing as a five course meal takes a bit of time to finish, longer than the lifespan of many a soldier who went over the top).

Suffice to say, there is no comparison between an uprising of ill-equipped, ill-trained volunteers fighting in their own streets to free their own country and dying side by side with their leaders and those who chose blindly to go abroad to maintain and further the imperial interests of their political and royal masters.

Sorry to say but thems the facts as I see it.

Niall said...

I was interested in the article up until this point,
"Ammunition and water ran out, but that Ulster Protestant siege mentality sustained them"
went down hill from there on in.
It reminded me of Israeli's demanding that the Palestinians be their friends while simultaneously seeking the Palestinians to forget all that they (the Isrealis) had inflicted on them for the Palestinians had also committed acts of violence against them.
Two State solution where only one should exist.
Same old rubbish re-spun.

Henry JoY said...

I very much agree with James's proposal that the time has come for agreeing respect for difference on matters of national identity preferences and that we find common purpose in the pursuit of issues which afford greater social justice and improve quality of life. I also agree that any such campaigns be exclusively by non-violent means.

Steve Ricardos said...

Niall,

"Two State solution where only one should exist."

Why?