A Day of Huge Significance

Galbally's Plunkett Nugent on Scotland, Ireland and the ongoing struggle for Independence. The contribution to the discussion featured as an 'op-ed' piece on the website of the 1916 Societies. The writer, Plunkett Nugent, is a lifelong Irish republican from the Galbally area in East Tyrone and a founding member of the PH Pearse Society Galbally/Cappagh. As a keen advocate of human rights he works as a Barrister At Law and is highly valued in his local community, with his many and varied contributions to local politics, history and culture widely respected in Galbally, its hinterland and beyond.

The 1916 Societies take this opportunity to forward best wishes to the Scottish people ahead of their vote for independence and encourage all those with a vote to use that vote, to vote ‘Yes’ and vote for independence – 1916 Societies

This is a day of huge political significance as Scotland goes to the polls, a day which may well bring the so-called United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to an end. Whatever the result, this binding exercise in national self-determination is in itself an outright triumph for those who have brought our neighbouring country to this crucial juncture. Far from the constitutional paralysis offered by the naysayers in the six-counties, our ‘Celtic Cousins’ have been enjoying the political equivalent of the Aurora Borealis which has been so accurately and eloquently described as ‘a two year festival of democracy’.

Informed international political opinion agrees that this represents ‘the Canary in the Coalmine’. A YES vote, in the face of the might of the Westminster axis, will send deeply felt tremors throughout the embedded political elites of Europe, re-energising the Catalans, the Basque People and the Flemish-speaking areas of Belgium. Even a narrow vote in favour of the status quo ensures that ‘all is changed utterly’. In promising and delivering such an opportunity to the Scottish electorate, in determining the historically significant date on which the vote is to be held, in shaping the response for Scottish independence in the affirmative and in extending the franchise to everyone over sixteen, the Scottish people have acted as an independent state in embryo. Nothing can or ever will be the same again and the old British constitutional order is torn asunder.

Yet many in Ireland are strangely muted on this issue and content to remain ‘mere spectators’. Not for them the courage or conviction of the James Connolly’s of this world, who fought across national boundaries in the cause of freedom, justice and the rights of man. Internationalism, an integral cornerstone of Irish republicanism and clearly evidenced in the 1916 Proclamation, has for some become an uncomfortable fact of political life.

Today also marks the one hundredth anniversary of Britain’s betrayal of the Redmondites, who having misplaced their trust in the Westminster Parliament to deliver Home Rule for all of Ireland were ‘rewarded for their loyalty’ on the 18th September 1914 with not one but two pieces of legislation; one delivering Home Rule and the other suspending it indefinitely ‘Until the War Ends’. Perfidious Albion in all its true glory, a betrayal sealed with the blood of thousands of young Irishmen in the slaughter of WW1, with redemption delivered only by the willingness of the men and women of the Easter Rising to ‘sacrifice themselves for the common good’ of the Irish nation.

The subsequent democratic endorsement of the Proclamation of the Irish Republic by an overwhelming majority of all the Irish people was predicated on Sinn Féin’s 1918 election manifesto, which proclaimed that ‘the right of a nation to sovereign independence rests upon immutable natural law and cannot be made the subject of a compromise’. It excoriated those who ‘in a supreme crisis for the nation, attempted to sell her birthright for the vague promises of English Ministers, and who showed their incompetence by failing to have even these promises fulfilled’. Almost a century later those who participate in what Connolly described as British ‘Ruling by Fooling’ continue to vest Ireland’s right to self-determination under the subjective control of a single British Minister whose ‘vague promises’ cannot be held in any way to account.

Others choose to challenge this affront to democracy. The James Connolly Society Scotland has been in the vanguard of the campaign for the freedom of small nations. Humbled that they are now formally affiliated to the 1916 Societies we are immensely proud of the part, however small, that those of us on this side of the Straits of Moyle have, through them, played in helping the people of Scotland in their efforts to achieve the first step to complete political independence. We are supremely confident that our Scottish comrades will not be found wanting when Ireland’s time, through a One Ireland-One Vote single referendum on Irish Unity, presents itself and allows our beloved country the opportunity to finally ‘take her place among the nations of the world’.

4 comments:

  1. Time and time again you give over your blog to help those of us trying to get our politics and opinions out to a wider audience Anthony, thanks once again for carrying this piece. A thoroughly enjoyable read it is too in my opinion!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Plunkett,

    I'd hazard a guess that the electorate in 1918 were as much influenced by their 'enlightened self-interest' as they would be today; in their voting preferences they were as much influenced by the impending extension of conscription into Ireland as they were to retrospectively endorsing the Proclamation.

    That they were primarily motivated to endorse the Proclamation, though that is constantly regurgitated by republicans, is not proven.

    The people of the island of Ireland in the plebiscites on The Good Friday Agreement rejected aspirations for territorial integration unless with the accent of a majority in the six counties.
    They retrospectively and democratically endorsed partition.

    Latest polls suggest that the Scots have voted to maintain the Union too.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "The people of the island of Ireland in the plebiscites on The Good Friday Agreement rejected aspirations for territorial integration unless with the accent of a majority in the six counties.
    They retrospectively and democratically endorsed partition."

    Henry Joy..I disagree.
    This argument is made time and again.
    fact is we don't know which part of the GFA people actually voted for>
    It is what??? An 80 -odd page document.
    So Why is the only thing that Unionists refer to is articles 2 & 3?
    People were told that it was the GFA or NO to peace.
    In that case.
    The only surefire thing to say is people voted for peace.

    The vast majority of Irish people still hold the view that partition is wrong.
    And your comparsion to Scotland tells us more than you think.
    The Scots were given ONE simple question..Where is the one for Ireland32 ?
    Who is afraid of democracy..NOT I?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ozzy

    Less than 30% of the 6 county electorate opposed the vote GFA ... and that figure included the DUP.

    Less than 6% of the turnout in the 26 counties opposed the changes to the territorial claims.

    Sure, the crowd may have been induced to choose Barabbas ... those who profess to be democrats will, for the time being at least, have to put up with the outcome of that vote.

    Those on either side that wish to re-kindle wild ideas in the heads of the young don't and won't have much support.

    Ok, many people compromised ... they accepted the agreement with the promise of peace ... an imperfect peace perhaps but many people will say you know Ozzie maybe this is as good as it gets.

    ReplyDelete