Menendez Fires Volley Across British Bows On Boston College Archive

Senate Foreign Relatons Committee chairman Robert Menendez
Senate Foreign Relatons Committee chairman Robert Menendez

A piece by Ed Moloney outlining the latest move in the Boston College Subpoena case. It initially featured on The Broken Elbow today.

Senator Robert Menendez, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and one of the most powerful Democrats in Congress has dramatically intervened in the Boston College subpoenas case by outlining a series of conditions that he says the US should impose if any further interviews from the Belfast Project archive at Boston College are handed over to the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) on foot of British subpoenas.


Menendez’s intervention came in the wake of the Boston-based First Circuit Court of Appeal’s June decision to impose separate limitations on the handover – reducing the number of interviews scheduled for handover from 85 to 12 – and only days after PSNI detectives had traveled to Boston to pick up tapes and transcripts of interviews made by the late Dolours Price, a former IRA member who in media interviews last autumn claimed to have helped ‘disappear’ alleged British Army informer Jean McConville in 1972.

The conditions outlined by Menendez were made in a letter sent to Secretary of State John Kerry on June 28th but only released last night to the media and they are sure to provoke controversy and opposition in some quarters in both parts of Ireland not least because the Senator lays claim to a US stake in the peace process and Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland.

He wrote: “Our country made a significant diplomatic investment in resolving ‘The Troubles’ in Northern Ireland. It would be a terrible error of judgement if the United States was not to engage now in the due diligence necessary to protect our investment in this hard-won peace.” With this language the Senate leader is saying unequivocally that the US has an interest in the possible negative effect on the peace process of handing over the Boston College tapes.

Secretary of State John Kerry
Secretary of State John Kerry

Menendez makes two important demands of Kerry and the Obama administration. One is that the State Department should vet the interviews scheduled for handover to determine whether their release would damage inter-communal relations or be counter to US national interests. He went on:

I share the concerns of many in the Irish-American community who have asserted that the nature of this request raises doubts about the wisdom of the British government’s Northern Ireland policies.

But it is his second demand that will anger some in Northern Ireland. He says that the US should invoke a clause in the Treaty with Britain which allows for the transfer of the interviews only for purposes which the US approves and has given consent to.

This clause would allow the United States to bar the British authorities from releasing the interviews for civil proceedings. Although Senator Menendez does not go into detail it is clear that the effect of this condition would be to stop the family of Jean McConville from suing Gerry Adams or any of the interviewees in a civil court, an outcome the family and their supporters have openly admitted is something they hope to see happening.

In a short statement Boston College campaigners Ed Moloney and Anthony McIntyre welcomed Senator Menendez’ intervention and said they hoped and expected to see his letter soon translated into action.

Here is the full text of Senator Menendez’s letter:

15 comments:

  1. What surprises me is the little (basically none) air-time the BC/Belfast Project gets on local radio.

    If I was a political commentator, I'd be talking this up. Very soon it will explode across all media outlets.

    I find it laughable that no other journalist who investigated any aspect of the troubles aren't asked to reveal their sources. Why isn't/wasn't Chris Ryder asked to reveal his 'inside' contacts within the RUC ? Or why don't the PSNI/RUC/HET ask Hugh Lister who is 'Davy' who told him in his book about Johnny Adiar that he pulled the trigger that killed Pat Finucane and not Ken Barret as the John Ware documentary claims...

    Maybe people don't want the truth to out or simply can't stomach the truth.

    As for the war crime charge that Michael McConville is calling for. There are almost 4,000 families who could claim the same.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Frankie,

    the Minister for the Disappeared accusing anybody of weasel words!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anthony,

    Only it's so serious, you could probably pen a tragic comedy on par with anything Shakespeare wrote.

    The number of times I've been gobsmacked over the whole BC project (I've lost count).

    I hear people saying they want a T & R process but very few are prepared to tell the truth. So yourself and Ed get together and ask former combatants if they are willing to tell their truths. They did freely and with out financial gain. And now the spooks in suits want to edit it...

    This is to Gerry Adams..You've a few more sheckles in the bank than me (you can afford a better lawyer than than my good-self). I believe you had a big part to play in the disappearance of Jean McConville and you were a member of the IRA. I'm not saying you were an operator of the caliber of Brendan Hughes but don't try to convince me you weren't a member.

    If you want to sue me, go ahead. You wont make much from me. But go ahead. I can pass my details via this site...

    Gerry, while the aren't admissible in court and it's only 97% 'true'..Take a polygraph. If you pass it, problem solved.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fun time Frankie-

    " I can pass my details via this site "

    You would not pass water-never mind those watery details-

    " if you pass it,problem solved."-

    Sounds like someone believe's in the polygraph test next-would you convict on just that test-

    ReplyDelete
  5. Michael,

    I never said I would convict on a polygraph. I can't convict anyone. I'm not a judge, juror or executioner. What I do know is if Gerry Adams took a polygraph and he passed (as in not being a member of the IRA) it would deflect a lot of the criticism he receives at present.

    I've also said I'm aware they aren't admissible in court.

    This point you made...

    You would not pass water-never mind those watery details-

    Michael be under no illusions I have no problems in passing my private contact details via this site. No qualms what so ever...

    I personally believe that Gerry Adams was a member of the provisionals. I can't say that any other way.

    Do you believe he was a member of the IRA? I'm not asking you to repeat what Gerry say's. I'm asking what you personally believe.

    ReplyDelete