We have never accepted or used the word murder. We would regard it as legislative language and aggressive language. It was the sort of language was always used against us. It would be like acknowledging that we were ‘criminals’ or ‘terrorists.’ - Michael Culbert, Irish News, 4th October 2011.



Frank Hughes’s 32nd anniversary took place on Sunday. The second of ten hunger strikers to die Big Frank, as his comrades from South Derry referred to him, although only 22 at the time of his arrest on St Patrick’s Day 1978, had already established a formidable reputation as one of the IRA’s most militarily efficient volunteers. His ability to emerge alive, although wounded, the same day from a British Army ambush and also kill a special forces member of the ambush team set him apart from many of his comrades who died in the course of similar encounters. It said something about his field craft and military instincts. A year earlier he had been named as one of the North‘s 3 most wanted men while he was evading the largest British security cordon yet seen in South Derry. The Repressive Security Apparatus of the British state feared Frank but he didn’t fear it.

The evening of his death after 59 days on hunger strike saw a silence descend upon the wing where I was held. If we didn’t know it already we realised it then that the British had successfully weathered the storm that followed the death of Bobby Sands and would give no quarter to either Patsy O’Hara or Raymond McCreesh, the two volunteers remaining on the strike after Frank’s death. It would take a strategic hiatus after the first four deaths to create the conditions in which the British were forced off their one track approach. The fate of Patsy and Raymond was as certain as the setting of the sun. They would as surely go down with it.

In one of the Sunday papers after Frank’s burial a member of the RUC was quoted as saying ‘Frankie was a murderer’ before going on to grudgingly acknowledge Frank’s efficiency at plying his armed craft. The RUC man’s comment was an attempt to state what was very much not obvious to many people the length and breadth of Ireland. He sought to criminalise Frank. There is nothing to suggest that Frank could not have lived with the description of him as a killer. Killing is what military personnel do. He killed the British soldier who engaged him in armed combat. He did not die disputing that he killed people but did so to make the point that he was not a common murderer and to have that recognised as a war right, an intrinsic but much fought over component in the war between the British state and the IRA.

The image of Frank Hughes in a military crawl as he, gravely injured by British Army gunfire, made his way to some form of shelter is far removed from the undignified crawl that the public witnessed Gerry Adams make during his Prime Time debacle with Miriam O Callaghan. There Adams, trying to slither away from a politically violent past he helped create, fallaciously argued that all killings are murder.

That is all very well if we wish to make an abstract philosophical point that war is murder on stilts even where stilts haul lethal war driven actions above the level of commonality; where the primary focus is on the violence sustained rather than inflicted, on what it means to be killed rather than to be killing, where the horrors of war in all its savagery are thrown up without the legal niceties and moral theorising. 

Adams was not making his point out of any philosophical conviction. It was made on grounds of pure pragmatic opportunism. In his own peculiarly serpentine way of doing business, he is meeting the establishment demand for the IRA’s armed struggle to be defined as a murder campaign. Crooked step by crooked step the IRA Adjutant General at the time of Frank Hughes’s death is moving toward the consummation of the Thatcher logic that crime is crime is crime.

There is nothing new in this approach. When Martin McGuinness in furtherance of his own political career during the Irish presidential campaign insisted that some IRA killings could be regarded as murder, it was clear that the thin edge of the stake was being pressed against, although not quite yet thrust into, the heart of the values of Ten Men Dead. Michael Colbert, currently aligned to Sinn Fein, convicted for killing a member of the RUC, objected.  Having spent years on protest denying that the action for which he was convicted and sentenced to life was criminal, he complained that it was a step too far.

Is Gerry Adams willing to tell the family of the IRA hunger striker Frank Hughes, convicted for killing a British soldier in an armed exchange, that Frank was a murderer? Will he attend a hunger strike commemoration in Bellaghy’s graveyard and announce ‘we gather here today to honour this murderer’?

It is as blunt as this: if we, the IRA volunteers, who killed on the orders of people like Adams, are murderers, he then is a mass murderer better suited to stand in The Hague rather than sit in the Dail.

Bloody Murdah

We have never accepted or used the word murder. We would regard it as legislative language and aggressive language. It was the sort of language was always used against us. It would be like acknowledging that we were ‘criminals’ or ‘terrorists.’ - Michael Culbert, Irish News, 4th October 2011.



Frank Hughes’s 32nd anniversary took place on Sunday. The second of ten hunger strikers to die Big Frank, as his comrades from South Derry referred to him, although only 22 at the time of his arrest on St Patrick’s Day 1978, had already established a formidable reputation as one of the IRA’s most militarily efficient volunteers. His ability to emerge alive, although wounded, the same day from a British Army ambush and also kill a special forces member of the ambush team set him apart from many of his comrades who died in the course of similar encounters. It said something about his field craft and military instincts. A year earlier he had been named as one of the North‘s 3 most wanted men while he was evading the largest British security cordon yet seen in South Derry. The Repressive Security Apparatus of the British state feared Frank but he didn’t fear it.

The evening of his death after 59 days on hunger strike saw a silence descend upon the wing where I was held. If we didn’t know it already we realised it then that the British had successfully weathered the storm that followed the death of Bobby Sands and would give no quarter to either Patsy O’Hara or Raymond McCreesh, the two volunteers remaining on the strike after Frank’s death. It would take a strategic hiatus after the first four deaths to create the conditions in which the British were forced off their one track approach. The fate of Patsy and Raymond was as certain as the setting of the sun. They would as surely go down with it.

In one of the Sunday papers after Frank’s burial a member of the RUC was quoted as saying ‘Frankie was a murderer’ before going on to grudgingly acknowledge Frank’s efficiency at plying his armed craft. The RUC man’s comment was an attempt to state what was very much not obvious to many people the length and breadth of Ireland. He sought to criminalise Frank. There is nothing to suggest that Frank could not have lived with the description of him as a killer. Killing is what military personnel do. He killed the British soldier who engaged him in armed combat. He did not die disputing that he killed people but did so to make the point that he was not a common murderer and to have that recognised as a war right, an intrinsic but much fought over component in the war between the British state and the IRA.

The image of Frank Hughes in a military crawl as he, gravely injured by British Army gunfire, made his way to some form of shelter is far removed from the undignified crawl that the public witnessed Gerry Adams make during his Prime Time debacle with Miriam O Callaghan. There Adams, trying to slither away from a politically violent past he helped create, fallaciously argued that all killings are murder.

That is all very well if we wish to make an abstract philosophical point that war is murder on stilts even where stilts haul lethal war driven actions above the level of commonality; where the primary focus is on the violence sustained rather than inflicted, on what it means to be killed rather than to be killing, where the horrors of war in all its savagery are thrown up without the legal niceties and moral theorising. 

Adams was not making his point out of any philosophical conviction. It was made on grounds of pure pragmatic opportunism. In his own peculiarly serpentine way of doing business, he is meeting the establishment demand for the IRA’s armed struggle to be defined as a murder campaign. Crooked step by crooked step the IRA Adjutant General at the time of Frank Hughes’s death is moving toward the consummation of the Thatcher logic that crime is crime is crime.

There is nothing new in this approach. When Martin McGuinness in furtherance of his own political career during the Irish presidential campaign insisted that some IRA killings could be regarded as murder, it was clear that the thin edge of the stake was being pressed against, although not quite yet thrust into, the heart of the values of Ten Men Dead. Michael Colbert, currently aligned to Sinn Fein, convicted for killing a member of the RUC, objected.  Having spent years on protest denying that the action for which he was convicted and sentenced to life was criminal, he complained that it was a step too far.

Is Gerry Adams willing to tell the family of the IRA hunger striker Frank Hughes, convicted for killing a British soldier in an armed exchange, that Frank was a murderer? Will he attend a hunger strike commemoration in Bellaghy’s graveyard and announce ‘we gather here today to honour this murderer’?

It is as blunt as this: if we, the IRA volunteers, who killed on the orders of people like Adams, are murderers, he then is a mass murderer better suited to stand in The Hague rather than sit in the Dail.

11 comments:

  1. Telling it as it is Anthony, and yet noone from quisling $inn £ein like Culbert will lift the gauntlet and argue on behalf of their big liar, or will it be Decciebroy Kearney tell us that the murders carried out by the ra were wrong and that quisling $inn £ein had spent the entire war years trying to demilitarize the situation and how sorry they are for taking so long in doing so, they as you know are engaged in attempting to ingratiate themselves in to the west brit society that is the Dail and rewrite history as they go along,the bearded one keeps lobbing verbal hand grenades into the movements and his own history and the faithful just put the head down and hope it doesnt explode, mind you a cushy well paid community job helps absorb any flack,you can fool some of the people all the time Gerrybroy but not all of the people any time.the president for life of quisling $inn £ein is no longer an asset to the party more of an ass.time he was put out to grass..

    ReplyDelete
  2. Adams has spent the best part of this farcical ‘peace process’ contradicting himself but if it were only himself that he affected with his remarks we could all live with that…I think! But he doesn’t contradict on his own or in isolation. His esoteric groupies and McGuinness aren’t far from his heels and can always be relied upon to either further enhance his ludicrous remarks or selflessly sacrifice their own sanity to expand upon these, in the belief that they are increasing their own intellectual property and thus their own value to the party, when in fact what they are doing is overburdening the asylum and it’s staff.

    An interesting question I was asked recently is why They make so many blunders now when throughout the war period They were held in esteem by so many and their intellectual acumen was taken as given. Were we too busy/distracted to care, or to notice how idiotic They were/are or what a future PR disaster they would turn out to be? Or back then, were we every bit as ‘intelligent’ as They and only through our own personal development, free from Their confines were we able to see the wood for the trees. Or is it a case that They have all been compromised by the British Intelligence services and thus are playing their game now and so the ubiquitous contradictions?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Niall or is it the men in grey suits have stopped writing their scripts for them and they are now caught in the vortex of shit emanating from the bearded ones orifice,it mattes not a jot which one as its all the same ,

    ReplyDelete
  4. Whilst this post is a retrospective look at the circumstances surrounding the '81 Hunger Strike and how they have been contorted to 'suite' the political dispensation on the partitioned island of Ireland there are extremely sad yet invaluable lessons to be learned for our 2013 generation of Irish Republican who believe militancy can achieve the desired objective of Irish unity.
    The lesson is not about our ability to overcome the perceived might of our British colonial oppressors but does the conviction and depth of faith needed, both collectively and individually within the Republican movement, EXIST in 2013?

    This article shows the stark contrast in terms of strength of conviction between the 10 Irish martyrs (who were willing to starve themselves to DEATH for both their cause and their comrades) and PSF's continuous capitulation since THEIR signing of the GFA which effectively triple-locking of Partition.

    " Never will they label our liberation struggle as criminal" ~ Óglach Bobby Sands (The People's Own MP of F/St) R.I.P.

    ReplyDelete
  5. typo 'suit' instead of 'suite'. Incidentally, the word 'suite' can mean among other things; !. in the context of a group or a group of rooms occupied as a unit, e.g. hotel OR 2. a group of people in attendance on a monarch or other person of high rank...both definitions are equally applicable to the administration of British colonial Rule and the facilitation of Capitalism (forthcoming G8 Conference in Fermanagh) in the 06C.

    ReplyDelete
  6. In recent years the shinners have reached a new low here in Derry in pursuit of votes, arriving at the funerals of families who would have Republican leanings with a Tricolour for the coffin.

    A few weeks ago I was at a wake and the deceased's son told me his father was only dead half a hour when they landed with a Tricolour.

    This week they reached a new low. The family in question told friends that when they were leaving the undertakers two shinners...We'll call them Burke and Hare...approached them and said they'd take care of the funeral. The family in question would have no time for the shinners but were caught on the hop.

    By the way the family found out that 'taking care of the funeral' meant putting the Tricolour on the coffin and taking it off again at the burial.

    I've heard of ambulance chasers but chasing hearses for votes has to be a new low even for them.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Jude Collins grasps the issue well I think:

    The trouble with declaring all killings to be murder, regardless of cause or political end, is that logic demands you denounce any decoration for war activities and embrace pacifism as a life-guiding philosophy. And not too many are prepared to go down that road.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anthony does that mean all those medals handed out at that posh hotel in Dublin a few years ago will have to be handed back..I do hope so..

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dixie:

    That's why they are called, "Low Life" , they crawl from beneath a flat rock with the Flag and trimmings for votes. Will they sink any lower , I would say YES.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think murder is an establishment word. Its the powers that be through the media who decide what murder is. ex, Lusitania murder, Belgrano not murder. Brit soldier shot murder, IRA man shot not murder. As in a previous post here on tpq, the media are now telling us which murders we should be crying over ex, Boston Bombing. Meanwhile an afghan wedding being bombed is not murder.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Mackers,
    Sean O Fiach wrote a brilliant response to Adams declaration in last Thursdays Irish News.
    I should imagine that letter caused as much embarrassment to many within Sinn Fein as the great leader himself.
    Sinn Fein now seem to be of the opinion that pleasing and appeasing is no longer enough. The armed struggle is now being reframed and defamed to the extent no one except those who see it through a Republican lense appear to know what it was about anymore.

    In relation to Sinn Fein's coffin watching exploits. I think Brian Mor's brilliant Tales of Vam-Pira cartoon on The Blanket years ago sums it up better than words.
    Adams dressed as Dracula is in search of an IRA funeral and is overcome with glee when his trusty accomplice and side kick spots one.

    ReplyDelete