Mitt's The Man

Ex-Blanket columnist Dr John Coulter is an avid American Republican supporter and controversial Tea Party enthusiast. In this no-punches-pulled article, he outlines why a Mitt Romney victory is the best outcome for Ireland's economy.

Ireland needs Mitt Romney as the next US President if the Emerald Isle is to claw its way out of economic turmoil. Defending Democratic President Barack Obama’s Train of Hope has come off the rails with only the scalp of terrorist scum Osama bin Laden to his credit.

But the hard reality is that Mitt is the lesser of the two evils, to coin a popular phrase. The last thing Ireland needs is another foreign dose of Obama’s wishy-washy liberal policies.

I want a strong, Christian, Right-wing President who will virtually order Irish Americans – indeed, anyone with even a drop of Irish blood in their veins – to visit Ireland and pump much-needed tourism cash into our island economy.

My only worry about Mitt is that he’s a Mormon by religious faith – and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is viewed as a very suspicious cult in Ireland, next to the Jehovah’s Witnesses, Scientologists and occult odd-balls.

Many traditional Christian denominations – both Catholic and Protestant – host Bible study sessions warning about the dangers posed by the well-dressed Mormon evangelists who tour all Irish housing developments with their distinct American accents, black name badges and crew-cut hair-dos.

If I suspected for one moment that Mitt would use his Presidency to ram Mormonism down our throats, then I’d have to eat my words and pray Obama gets in for a second term. But if Mitt keeps his Book of Mormon firmly in his hip pocket, then the Republican Party candidate is the right President to make 2013’s Gathering a ‘Mitt-Roaring Success’!

The Gathering is a high-wire plan to attract hundreds of thousands of people with Irish roots back to the Emerald to kick-start the economy. Ironically, our island’s biggest export at the moment is our people, especially our youth.

It is tearful to sit at Dublin and Belfast International airports and watch the hundreds of talented young people with their bags packed leaving Ireland ‘for good’ because the Celtic Tiger economy has been skinned alive.

Mitt is also the man to encourage the UK and Ireland to develop their respective armies, not fire much-needed troops. We need as many soldiers as possible for the inevitable war against Iran. We need a tough-talking American President who will back Israel to the hilt. Ireland needs a President who will pull all British and American troops out of Afghanistan and if the Afghans start pissing about, then drop a couple of nukes on their miserable little state. The hard military medicine which the UK and US must swallow is that if the once mighty Russian empire could not tame the Afghans, what makes the West think it can succeed where the Soviet Union so blatantly failed?

A President Mitt can also persuade – or bully – the Dail into getting Southern Ireland to drop its totally daft neutrality stance and devote troops into an international brigade to defend Israel against the Holocaust-style agenda of Iranian screwball president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Instead of cutting jobs in British and Irish armed forces, a President Mitt could ensure a rapid expansion of the police, army, navy and airforce in Ireland and the UK. Irish troops have served with distinction in the United Nations forces across the globe, especially in the Middle East. Many British Army regiments have and are packed with Irish people.

A President Mitt along with British Premier Dandy Dave Cameron could boost Ireland’s economy north and south by stocking the island full of nuclear missiles, submarines and planes. Think of the support jobs which would flow from building our armed forces on both sides of the border. Mitt Romney has my vote as the man who can revive the Celtic Tiger.  

34 comments:

  1. OK, I get it now. John Coulter is not a right-wing evangelical Christian loon; he is a parody of one. This article is a piss-take.

    PS. Is Mitt Romney's Mormonism any more daft than fundamentalist Protestantism? At least the Catholic Church accepts evolution and well-established scientific theories.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anthony; is this a satirical piece?

    Order Irish Americans to come to Ireland and invest? Nuke Afghanistan?

    At what point do you wake up and have your cornflakes mate?

    Romney is a no hoper. Even I know that it's Paul Ryan who's being fielded now for the next presidency - and I know bugger all about American politics, only about their policies and how they're destroying the world.

    Prepare for the war against Iran! Back Israel to the hilt. You sir are a fool, a dangerous and articulate one, but a fool all the same.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ireland and the world needs the "Mutt"like a hole in the head.the gathering is a good idea only if those who were forced to emigrate bring home guns and shoot the fuckers who caused their grief.Obama the country is fucked the economy is in freefall but hey ho we got Bin Laden,

    ReplyDelete
  4. I suppose I could take the time to dissect Dr. Coulter's essay, and deconstruct the flawed reasoning within. But I wonder would ther be any point?
    This writing dismays and frightens me. I have no doubt that the outcome of this election will eventually influence events this side of the Atlantic but I am inclined to think that since this wee group of islands is not the centre of the universe, the effect of that influence will be incidental as opposed to anything designed. I only hope that who ever wins does not share Dr Coulter's vision.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Doctor death John Coulter-

    And i thought that Romney was as mad as a mitter-

    " we need as many soldiers as possible for the inevitable war against Iran "

    So it would be less tearful to see the youth comming home in their coffins than to see them get onto planes for safe jobs abroad-

    crazy jo also wants to nuke the afgans-your for hell lad-





    ReplyDelete
  6. Belfast Bookworm,

    I wish it was satire. John has views which simply do not correspond to reality - no evolution or anything. Then this on the reactionary Romney. Been down with a vomiting bug all day but I don't blame the article!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Tony,

    great to see you commenting here. How are things? I think your comment sums up what a lot think about this type of argument

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anthony; no evolution eh?

    This is one of those tin of tartan paint jobs isn't it?

    Next you'll be telling me John believes the human race started with a rib from Adam and that women are being punished with the pain of childbirth for Eve's sins in the garden of Eden!

    ReplyDelete
  9. belfast bookworm

    'Next you'll be telling me John believes the human race started with a rib from Adam and that women are being punished with the pain of childbirth for Eve's sins in the garden of Eden!'

    so they should be!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Larry; I refuse to be drawn into this conversation - you're obviously a religious fanatic like Mr Coulter!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Why do we still carry Coulter's garbage on this website? If ever there was a justification for censorship it would be with him.
    John I just cast my vote for Barack and I am supremely confident he will be re elected and it will not even be close. Romney would take us back to the Bush years and most right thinking Americans want no part of that.
    It's like when people in the North talk about the dissidents taking them back to "the bad old days". Same here with Mitt. No thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This is almost as fantastic as the origins of the Latter Day Saints nothing elitist or cultist about declaring members of a religion saints Mormon sounding less religiously obnoxious.

    The notion that prosperity is only a latter day saint away not just for America but for the world can as always be put to sleep for another four years until the next round of the most powerful nation on earth and its electoral promises.

    I do not see Dr Coulter arguing for anything other than wanting a religious nut at the helm in America and considering it is a Mormon whose rulebook is not the bible only highlights the desperation of right wing religious logic.

    Good luck with the Irish tourist scheme funding a north south Irish army to go fight the Persians.
    Sad times Dr Coulter when your only hope for a speedy modern Crusade rests in the hands of a latter day saint I doubt very much if the Old or New Testament gods would approve.

    If he does win hopefully, his advisors will have the foresight and hide that magic talking hat for his tenure.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Obama made it. There are so many shortcomings with him but the notion of having Romney in the White House ruling on behalf of the rabid religious and the rapacious rich would be good for nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I always wonder about the logic that calls Osama Bin Laden a terrorist yet advocates nuclear bombing of entire countries.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Difference between O'Bama and Romney, now that O'Bama is in again WW3 may be delayed by 6 months.

    ReplyDelete
  16. No surprise. Coulter must be as sick as you were yesterday Anthony. (hopefully you're better now).

    I've no great hopes for Obama. Having a black face doesn't make you any less of a 'see you next tuesday' but I'd still rather have him than any republican.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Great idea of Obama,s to locate the polling stations next to KFC...

    ReplyDelete
  18. Loved this article – very witty – reminds me of the auld Kenny Everett comedy sketch where he portrays an American commander, chest decorated with all sorts of colourful medals, waving a 45 while hanging out of tank turret and his message for all the worlds ills was to round them up, put ‘em in a field and bomb the bastards…

    Damn it John, just heard, Obama won……let's see, who else is available,mmmmmmmmm, Netenyahu, now there’s a bloke we could work with!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Belfast Bookworm,

    the kids are over it but I am still plagued by something. Think Carrie is going down with it also. I think they call it the Winter Vomiting Bug. Had to cancel root canal treatment yesterday over it.

    What will Obama do now? As little as he did last time around I suppose. There was a great piece I read from a former supporter on why he wouldn't support him this time - mostly to do with Foreign Policy. There is just more cause to hope that he won't screw the poor as much as Romney would have. But not a lot. I think we will see things manifest themselves even more viciously in the Cultural Wars. It is where the Republicans probably feel they can mobilise opposition. If Romney felt he could win by telling the Ohio workforce their industries should have gone under, they don't seem to be in tune with the economic mood music on the streets.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anthony; I don't know how bad your bug was but I'd take any bug over root canal treatment any day! Glad youre on the mend.

    I agree with you that Obama won't do a lot but I'm cautious about saying he's the best out of a bad bunch.

    I think that to go into politics a person has to have a desire to yield power and control. There is something inherently wrong with that and I'm immediately dubious about any politician as there has to be a defect kn their personality to aspire to be a politician.

    I think Obama getting the presidency last time around was a massive PR stunt; stick a black person up there, show the world that we're changing, that we're not the right wing fascists you think we are.

    Next it'll be a woman - god forbid!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anthony,

    Given that John Coulter has advocated exterminating the people of Afghanistan if they "start pissing about", I respectfully suggest that this article be moved to the sewer.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Alfie,

    I don't think it qualifies. And I may be wrong. It is a judgement call and one I will only make with the greatest of hesitation in relation to anything being flushed down the sewer. It is certainly an odious line of reasoning pursued by John but it stirkes me as being more of a polemic. Again I stand to be contradicted on this.

    I tend to give greater latitude to those who have the courage to stand over their opinions.

    If somebody was to advocate as a military strategy a nuclear strike against Israel by say Iran or Pakistan I would allow it to be carried despite finding it abhorrent.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anthony,

    "I tend to give greater latitude to those who have the courage to stand over their opinions."

    Fair enough. I appreciate that John Coulter is your friend and I am not suggesting censoring him. It is just that I find this particular article - with its aspiration that the next US president bully allied nations and exterminate weak enemy nations - to be fascist and genocidal. I mean, if truthrevisionist were willing to use his real name, would you give him the space for an article denying the Holocaust? Indeed, would you give a member of the CIRA the opportunity to argue for attacks on prison officers and the PSNI?

    It must also be said that this article was published in the Irish Daily Star on Tuesday. Thus, John has had the opportunity to express his odious views in the mainstream media. My point is that an uncensored space for Coulter and any other advocates of mass murder of civilians is already available on your blog. In my view, that is where they belong.

    ReplyDelete
  24. If somebody was to advocate as a military strategy a nuclear strike against Israel by say Iran or Pakistan I would allow it to be carried despite finding it abhorrent.

    some might even consider it over due!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Alfie; I disagree with you. This post should definitely stay up as it lets everyone see what a fruitcake this guy is.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Alfie,

    It is not simply a question of friendship although we do shade things for friends. I know you were not arguing for him to be censored. Your suggestion that he go to the sewer was not a call for him to be censored but to be shifted to a place where you think his views should be. By going to the sewer people aren’t censored.

    It is not that articles denying the Holocaust are inadmissible. I published before in some magazine in opposition to David Irving being jailed and argued the case that people should be allowed to deny the Holocaust just as they can be allowed to deny the Rwandan genocide. Truthrevisionist is a troll who was called out on being from North Belfast by Belfast Bookworm. But we had worked that out before then. We permitted rants from TR and a wide range of comments. When it comes down to simple Jewphobia, well that gets flushed to the censor.

    But I do feel that invisible people have invisible rights. If people want to make these sort of hate fuelled arguments (based on the most atrocious of sources – Fred Leuchter, seriously?), it is so easy to get the drift. And of course the hiding behind the shield of anonymity, as you pointed out in another post, is cowardice which the laughable comparison with George Orwell does nothing to make right.

    Indeed, would you give a member of the CIRA the opportunity to argue for attacks on prison officers and the PSNI?

    I would but 1/ they need to stand over it and 2/ we need to be sure we don’t get prosecuted over what they write 3/ it does not lead directly to the death of another person. Sinn Fein argued the pro war position for years yet faced Section 31 censorship in the South. We opposed them being censored.

    The article being published in the Daily Star (which I was unaware of) works both ways – your way, for sure, but also the other way: as it is already out there in a widely read outlet, by reproducing it on the blog we are hardly increasing the dissemination of the ideas.

    My point is that an uncensored space for Coulter and any other advocates of mass murder of civilians is already available on your blog. In my view, that is where they belong.

    You might have a point but I don’t think there is any one prevailing view on the matter. And until such times as I am persuaded to the contrary, he stays out of the sewer. It is a last resort.

    I hope I have made the correct judgement call here but I can't be absolutely certain of it.

    ReplyDelete
  27. im getting nervous after reading that!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anthony,

    Perhaps my reaction to this piece was a little over-the-top. I believe in the principle that ideas should rise or fall by their own merit, not by censorship.

    Nevertheless, I still firmly believe that the likes of John Coulter must be challenged. He is a man who condemns Irish republicans as murderers, yet he endorses with simpering insouciance the murder of countless innocent civilians. His sheer hypocrisy is quite staggering.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Alfie,

    I still firmly believe that the likes of John Coulter must be challenged.

    Indeed. I think most here have done it through the mechanism of ridicule. I find his views on these matters hopelessly reactionary but we are open to all manner of ideas in the same belief as you that they stand or fall on their own merits. If John lcaked the courage to stand over his views he would not be featuring here with articles.

    ReplyDelete
  30. 'His sheer hypocrisy quite staggering'

    All the more reason to give him airtime in my opinion. Enough rope and all that.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Seems the first thing O'Bama did after being elected again was to approve a drone strike in E. Africa. Murderer?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Larry;

    Why the ?? Isn't that a given?

    ReplyDelete
  33. Ryan,

    Romney was not the man for the job but is Obama much of an improvement/ I am reminded of Kissinger’s comment on the Iran-Iraq war, pity they both can’t lose. While we are very critical of Romney the case for censoring a view that would back him has thus far been lamentably poor. There are many people who would object to your pro Israel discourse on the blog but they don’t call for you to be censored.


    Tain Bo,

    Magic talking hats and zombie worship. Would they ever ...

    ReplyDelete
  34. Mitt's The Man

    Belfast Bookworm,

    Root canal is not good. So, have the bulk of it done. Waiting on a post prior to a crowning!!

    I think that to go into politics a person has to have a desire to yield power and control.

    Most pronounced in the case of Adams. It projects a megalomania and the total absence of any democratic culture.

    They are talking about Hillary next time round.

    ReplyDelete